Instrumental variables (IV) are used to draw causal conclusions about the effect of exposure E on outcome Y in the presence of unmeasured confounders. IV assumptions have been well described: (1) IV affects E; (2) IV affects Y only through E; (3) IV shares no common cause with Y. Even when these assumptions are met, biased effect estimates can result if selection bias allows a noncausal path from E to Y. We demonstrate the presence of bias in IV analyses on a sample from a simulated dataset, where selection into the sample was a collider on a noncausal path from E to Y. By applying inverse probability of selection weights, we were able to eliminate the selection bias. IV approaches may protect against unmeasured confounding but are not immune from selection bias. Inverse probability of selection weights used with IV approaches can minimize bias.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5378646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000639DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selection bias
16
noncausal path
8
inverse probability
8
probability selection
8
selection weights
8
selection
7
bias
6
instrumental variable
4
variable analyses
4
analyses selection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!