Background: Quantification of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood stem cell apheresis is normally performed by single platform flow cytometric measurements according to the ISHAGE protocol. Peripheral blood stem cell concentrates (PBSC) produced by apheresis normally contain many T cells. Those T cells can be used for production of donor lymphocyte infusion doses, if abundant amounts of CD34+ cells have been collected. Therefore, it is of interest to know both the CD3+ and the CD34+ cell count of allogeneic PBSC. This is the first study comparing the performance of a modified ISHAGE protocol allowing additional quantification of CD3+ cells on two different flow cytometers, the FACSCalibur and the FACSVerse, respectively.
Methods: CD45+ and CD34+ cell concentrations were measured using a standard and a modified ISHAGE protocol including CD3+ cell quantification on both machines. All cell concentrations were measured using a Trucount bead based stem cell enumeration kit. The FACSVerse machine can additionally be equipped with a sample volume sensor allowing cell quantification without using beads. The samples analysed were taken from granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cell apheresis procedures (pre- and post-apheresis, and apheresis concentrate).
Results: There were no significant differences in cell concentrations measured by the standard and modified ISHAGE protocol, regardless of which machine had been used when using bead quantification. No significant differences between the results of the two flow cytometers using the modified ISHAGE protocol were observed. Pearson´s correlation was always > 0.96, and regression coefficients were higher than 0.93. The only significant differences were observed between bead quantification and volume sensor quantification on the FACSVerse machine.
Conclusions: The modified ISHAGE protocol can effectively be used on both flow cytometers tested, especially if bead quantification is used.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160429 | DOI Listing |
Transfus Med Hemother
October 2023
Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg - Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus
July 2023
Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 605006 Puducherry, India.
Purpose: Hematogones have similar antigenic and light scatter properties when compared to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) but they form a separate cluster with dimmer CD45 expression. These should be excluded while enumerating HSC, as their inclusion can overestimate and hence affect the final dose of HSC. However, their exact impact on the outcome of HSC transplant (HSCT) is not entirely known and hence this study was undertaken to address these issues, if any.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
October 2022
Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Stem Cell Facility, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10353, Berlin, Germany.
The most widely used quality control assay for CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell product characterization is the protocol established by the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE). While this protocol is still the gold standard for stem cell enumeration and viability assessment, it does not include T cell enumeration, which is nowadays mandatory for assaying standard allogeneic grafts and various advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). In accordance, we have developed and extensively validated a new approach for a more comprehensive characterization of hematopoietic cellular products using a pre-formulated dried antibody format panel.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHematol Transfus Cell Ther
December 2020
Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Background: This study aims to validate the single-platform method for enumeration of CD34+ cells, by comparing the performance of two different commercial kits, as well as to evaluate the efficiency of the Accuri C6 cytometer in providing direct counts of absolute cell numbers.
Method: We evaluated 20 samples from umbilical cord blood (UCB), comparing the two different methodologies for enumeration of CD34+ cells: single and dual-platform. For the assessment of the single-platform, Procount and SCE kits were used, both of which use fluorescent beads as a counting reference to obtain absolute CD34+ cells numbers.
Int J Lab Hematol
February 2021
Clinical Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Introduction: CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) enumeration by cell flow cytometry is routinely used in clinical laboratories for monitoring of HSC mobilization into peripheral blood and assessment of the quality of HSC products. The modified ISHAGE protocol is the most often used procedure for determination of CD34+ cells using flow cytometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate BD Enumeration stem cell kit on flow cytometer BD facscanto II, using facscanto clinical and facsdiva softwares.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!