A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A new simplified electrocardiographic score predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with CRT. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • CRT (Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) helps reduce complications in heart failure patients, but about one-third don’t respond well to it.
  • A study of 491 patients showed that specific ECG measurements could predict which patients would have better outcomes after receiving CRT.
  • Using a scoring system based on these ECG parameters, researchers found that a higher score indicated a greater likelihood of improved heart function and survival rates.

Article Abstract

Aims: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex, but up to 1/3 of patients are "non-responders" to the therapy. This study examines the ability of a simple standard electrocardiogram (ECG)-based scoring system to predict clinical outcome.

Methods And Results: Four hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients with CRT-implants (79% males, mean age 71 years, LVEF 24%, 59% with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 83% in NYHA class III) were included from a single large volume centre. All patients met standard indications for CRT, and were followed for 3 years after CRT implantation. Three ECG parameters were measured on the post-implant ECG, and compared to pre-implantation measurements: QRS duration, time to intrinsicoid deflection onset (ID) in V1 lead, amplitude change in V1 lead. Each positive ECG variable was given a numerical value of 1 to create the score (ranging 0-3). Clinical outcome was assessed as a composite of all-cause death, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation and HF hospitalization. Event-free survival was predicted by shortening of QRS duration ≥20 ms (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.90] P = 0.009), ≥50% decreased summed R + S amplitude in V1 lead (HR 0.67 [0.49-0.90] P = 0.009) and ≤40 msec ID time in lead V1 during pacing (HR 0.63 [0.46-0.86] P = 0.004). The total score was an independent predictor for both event-free survival (HR 0.65 [0.54-0.77] P < 0.001) and for ≥10% left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (OR 1.7 [1.3-2.3] P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Composite data from 12-lead ECG during CRT-treatment can be used in a simple score to predict long-term clinical outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw382DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical outcome
8
event-free survival
8
patients
5
simplified electrocardiographic
4
electrocardiographic score
4
score predicts
4
predicts clinical
4
outcome patients
4
patients treated
4
crt
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!