Introduction: Removal of symptomatic implants is a common procedure performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. No guidance is available regarding which factors contribute to the likelihood of an implant becoming symptomatic. Our objective was to determine whether radiographic parameters associated with distal interlocks in retrograde femoral nails are associated with the rate of symptomatic screw removal.
Patients And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center. Study patients (n=442) had femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails from 2007 to 2014 and at least 1year of follow-up. The main outcome measurement was symptomatic distal screw removal as predicted by radiographic parameters.
Results: Symptomatic screw removal occurred in 12% of the patients. Increased distance between the most distal screw and the articular surface of the femur significantly reduced likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. A cutoff of 40mm from the articular block was predictive of removal (≥40mm, 0% removal; <40mm, 18% removal, p<0.0001). In patients with distal screws placed within 40mm of the articular surface of the femur, a ratio of screw length to distance between medial and lateral femoral cortices that was ≥1 was a strong predictor of symptomatic screw removal (area under Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, 0.75; p<0.0001).
Conclusions: More distal screws and screws that radiographically extend to or beyond the medial cortex are more likely to cause pain and require removal in femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nails. We identified a specific distance from the joint (<40mm) and a ratio of screw length to bone width (≥1) that significantly increased the likelihood of symptomatic screw removal. Clinicians can use these data to inform patients of the likely risk of implant removal and perhaps to better guide placement and length of screws when the clinical scenario allows some flexibility in location and length of screws.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.015 | DOI Listing |
J Neurosurg Spine
January 2025
2Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and.
Objective: Spinal fusion is a commonly performed surgical procedure used to relieve pain, deformity, and instability of various spinal pathologies. Although there have been attempts to standardize spinal fusion assessment radiologically, there is currently no unified definition that also considers clinical symptomology. This review attempts to create a more holistic and standardized definition of spinal fusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Background: Tropical Candida spondylitis is an uncommon cause of lower back pain in patients, especially in non-tropical areas or in patients not at risk of immunocompromise.
Case Presentation: A 65-year-old woman presented with a six-month history of poorly managed low back pain, now accompanied by numbness and pain in both lower extremities. Her medical history was significant for tertiary hypertension.
J Hip Preserv Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 5420 W Loop South, Suite 2300, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a procedure used to treat patients with hip dysplasia. Current literature reports symptomatic hardware removal (HWR) rates of 13.6% following PAO.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSkeletal Radiol
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Objectives: To evaluate CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with and without revision surgery (RS) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).
Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, two radiologists assessed CT imaging findings in symptomatic patients with RSA over 5 years, including material fracture and loosening of the peg, baseplate, screws, and humeral stem, screw positioning, prosthesis dislocation, glenoid notching, fractures, and deltoid muscle quality. The primary outcome parameter was RS.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Unit, San Giuliano Hospital, Giugliano in Campania, Italy.
We present the case of a 64-year-old man who, during the implantation of an active-fixation leadless pacemaker (LP, Aveir VR, Abbott, USA), underwent several external defibrillation shocks up to 240 Joules, due to symptomatic sustained supraventricular tachycardia at 160 bpm. The shocks, delivered both before and after the screwing of the device in the low interventricular septum, did not cause any technical damage to the device, and no complications were observed. The device was then deployed successfully.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!