A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validity of rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee: A cadaveric study comparing radiostereometry and the Rotab®. | LitMetric

Validity of rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee: A cadaveric study comparing radiostereometry and the Rotab®.

Knee

Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Rouen Teaching Medical Center, 76031 Rouen cedex, France; CETAPS-EA 3832, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Rouen, 76821 Mont Saint Aignan, France.

Published: March 2017

Background: In current practice, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can be diagnosed using several devices to measure anterior tibial translation and rotational knee laxity, but these measures are never collected together. The Rotab®, which yields simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and passive lower limb rotation under stress, would therefore be advantageous in current practice, but its reliability has never been tested.

Aim Of Study: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Rotab® compared to the reference system, radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Methods: This anatomical study was conducted on 14 lower limbs collected from fresh cadavers. Simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and rotation were obtained with both systems, with antero-posterior (AP) forces of 134N and 250N using the Rotab®. Measurements were made on intact ACL and then repeated after ACL section. Variables were analyzed in univariate analysis by ANOVA, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the systems was determined by the Bland and Altman method.

Results: The difference between the two methods for evaluating anterior tibial translation was 0.05±0.98mm at 134N and 0.29±1.04mm at 250N. The correlation between the tests was high (r=r=0.97, p=0.8). The difference between the two methods for rotational laxity was 0.69±2.7° at 134N and 0.5±0.6° at 250N. The Rotab® showed a significant difference only at 250N for rotational laxity after the ACL tear.

Conclusion: The Rotab® is a reliable device to measure rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.01.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotational laxity
16
anterior tibial
16
tibial translation
16
laxity coupled
8
coupled anterior
8
anterior translation
8
translation knee
8
current practice
8
simultaneous measurements
8
measurements anterior
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!