Purpose: Because of the improvement of medical therapy and the corresponding increase in life expectancy, orthopaedic surgeons are obliged to perform more wide resections rather than intramedullary stabilization nailing for patients affected by tumours of the hip compared to the past. Wide resection often causes joint instability, so prosthetic reconstruction presents a higher risk of dislocation than in primary osteoarthritis cases. The aim of the present paper is to classify the indications for the dual mobility cup (DMC) hip prosthesis based on the anatomic structures involved in the disease and to analyse the rationale to reduce the risk of dislocation.

Methods: Indications were analyzed and classified based on all the cases in which the DMC prosthesis was used for reconstruction after hip resection in an oncological research hospital.

Results: Four classes of indications were identified; for classes I and IV the indication for DMC prosthesis can be considered strong; for classes II and III the indications must be evaluated considering the specific case, based on life expectancy, performance status, presence of osteoarthritis, and availability of adjuvant local therapies. When the DMC prosthesis is indicated, the cup should always be cemented, either alone or with augmentation techniques, to decrease the risk of mobilization due to local disease progression.

Conclusions: DMC can be a valid alternative in reconstruction of the hip after tumor removal; nevertheless, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to verify the real dislocation rate based on the entity of resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3407-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dmc prosthesis
12
dual mobility
8
mobility cup
8
life expectancy
8
reconstruction hip
8
indications
5
dmc
5
cup muscular
4
muscular skeletal
4
skeletal oncology
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The dual mobility cup (DMC) reduces the dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA). DMC systems include anatomical (non-modular or monoblock) (ADM) and modular dual mobility (MDM) components (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). This review aims to assess differences between these two types of DMC implants concerning dislocation and revision rates, as well as patient-reported outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The choice between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures remains debated. There is increasing use in dual mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (DMC-THA) to prevent dislocations in these high-risk patients. Aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze patients treated in a single Center for femoral neck fracture comparing HA and DMC-THA in terms of: functional outcome, rate of complications and mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The increased availability of dual-mobility acetabular constructs (DMCs) provides surgeons with a newer option to increase the effective femoral head size in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). We sought to evaluate risks of re-revision and prosthetic dislocation following rTHA involving a DMC compared with other articulations.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from a U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The SOFCOT has been tracking hip prostheses data from nearly 100 centers in France since 2006, collecting a total of 58,314 surgeries primarily for osteoarthritis and femoral neck fractures, mostly in women around 71 years old.
  • - The research indicates that while the register's representativeness is low, it offers valuable insights into the performance and evolution of hip arthroplasty techniques and implants over the years.
  • - The analysis showed that early revision rates for hip prostheses were influenced by implant type and fixation method, with a revision index revealing low rates overall, indicating promising durability for certain implants like dual-mobility cups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A comparison was made between two common treatments for ISR: drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and DES, through a review of randomized controlled trials involving 1,100 patients.
  • * Results indicated that while DCB had a higher risk of needing additional procedures (target lesion revascularization), both DCB and DES showed similar outcomes regarding overall safety and effectiveness, with no significant differences in mortality or other major complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!