Purpose: Because of the improvement of medical therapy and the corresponding increase in life expectancy, orthopaedic surgeons are obliged to perform more wide resections rather than intramedullary stabilization nailing for patients affected by tumours of the hip compared to the past. Wide resection often causes joint instability, so prosthetic reconstruction presents a higher risk of dislocation than in primary osteoarthritis cases. The aim of the present paper is to classify the indications for the dual mobility cup (DMC) hip prosthesis based on the anatomic structures involved in the disease and to analyse the rationale to reduce the risk of dislocation.
Methods: Indications were analyzed and classified based on all the cases in which the DMC prosthesis was used for reconstruction after hip resection in an oncological research hospital.
Results: Four classes of indications were identified; for classes I and IV the indication for DMC prosthesis can be considered strong; for classes II and III the indications must be evaluated considering the specific case, based on life expectancy, performance status, presence of osteoarthritis, and availability of adjuvant local therapies. When the DMC prosthesis is indicated, the cup should always be cemented, either alone or with augmentation techniques, to decrease the risk of mobilization due to local disease progression.
Conclusions: DMC can be a valid alternative in reconstruction of the hip after tumor removal; nevertheless, prospective, randomized studies are necessary to verify the real dislocation rate based on the entity of resection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3407-4 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
November 2024
Orthopedic Department Henri Mondor Hospital, University Paris East, Creteil, France.
Purpose: The dual mobility cup (DMC) reduces the dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA). DMC systems include anatomical (non-modular or monoblock) (ADM) and modular dual mobility (MDM) components (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). This review aims to assess differences between these two types of DMC implants concerning dislocation and revision rates, as well as patient-reported outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInjury
September 2024
Department of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. Electronic address:
Introduction: The choice between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures remains debated. There is increasing use in dual mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (DMC-THA) to prevent dislocations in these high-risk patients. Aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze patients treated in a single Center for femoral neck fracture comparing HA and DMC-THA in terms of: functional outcome, rate of complications and mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bone Joint Surg Am
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Harbor City, California.
Background: The increased availability of dual-mobility acetabular constructs (DMCs) provides surgeons with a newer option to increase the effective femoral head size in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). We sought to evaluate risks of re-revision and prosthetic dislocation following rTHA involving a DMC compared with other articulations.
Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from a U.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
February 2025
RENACOT, 56, rue Boissonade, 75014, Paris, France.
Am J Cardiol
September 2024
Cardiovascular Institute, DMC Heart Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!