Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
It has now been more than 20 years since laparoscopic gastrectomy was introduced in Japan, and the 2014 guidelines recommend laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as a treatment for cStage I gastric cancers. This operation facilitates minute lymphadenectomy via the option of enlarging the image, but there are some difficulties associated with limited range of motion. A hallmark of gastrectomy for gastric cancer is the widespread dissection of lymph nodes, and the limits imposed by laparoscopic forceps can complicate the operation. In this study, we subdivided regional lymph nodes, examined distal gastrectomy cases in our hospital, and compared the contents of lymphadenectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!