Design and Validation of the GI-NEC Score to Prognosticate Overall Survival in Patients With High-Grade Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.

J Natl Cancer Inst

Affiliations of authors: Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (ENETS Centre of Excellence), Manchester, UK (AL, MGM, RAH, JWV, JB); Department of Medical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital, University of Lyon, Lyon, France (TW, PF); Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany (MP); Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium (IB); Department of Medical Oncology, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain (BN, RGC); Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (ENETS Centre of Excellence), London, UK (AC, TM); Institute of Cancer Sciences (MGM, JWV) and Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health (JB), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Published: January 2017

Background: Prognostic markers for risk stratification of patients with gastrointestinal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs) are lacking; we designed and validated a prognostic score for overall survival (OS).

Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed in five neuroendocrine specialist European centers were included. Patients were divided into three cohorts: a training cohort (TC), an external validation cohort (EVC), and a prospective validation cohort (PVC). Prognostic factors were identified by log-rank test, Cox-regression, and logistic regression analyses. The derived score was internally and externally validated. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Of 395 patients screened, 313 were eligible (TC = 109 patients, EVC = 184 patients, and PVC = 20 patients). The derived prognostic score included five variables: presence of liver metastases, alkaline phosphatase (ALK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and Ki67. In multivariable analysis, the score was prognostic for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.47 to 2.35, P < .001) and had good discrimination (C-index = 0.76) and calibration (mean error = 0.021, 90th percentile = 0.037) in the TC. These results were validated in the EVC and PVC, in which our score was able to prognosticate for OS when adjusted for other prognostic variables in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.71, P = .001; and HR = 4.51, 95% CI = 1.87 to 10.87, P = .001, respectively). The score classified patients into two groups with incremental risk of death: group A (0-2 points, 181 patients [63.9%], median OS = 19.4 months, 95% CI = 16.1 to 25.1) and group B (3-6 points, 102 patients [36.1%], median OS = 5.2 months, 95% CI = 3.6 to 6.9).

Conclusions: The GI-NEC score identifies two distinct patient cohorts; it provides a tool for clinicians when making treatment decisions and may be used as a stratification factor in future clinical trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw277DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
11
score
8
gi-nec score
8
score prognosticate
8
neuroendocrine carcinomas
8
prognostic score
8
validation cohort
8
multivariable analysis
8
months 95%
8
prognostic
6

Similar Publications

Accurate and timely diagnosis of t(9;22)-positive leukemias is vital to improving survival in pediatric patients. In low-resource settings, where healthcare disparities are exacerbated by limited resources, cost-effective and efficient diagnostic methods are essential for bridging these gaps and ensuring better outcomes. Among the diagnostic tools evaluated among 23 patients sample, RT-PCR demonstrated superior sensitivity (100%) and the shortest turnaround time (7 days), significantly outperforming FISH and karyotyping in both accuracy and timeliness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To incorporate a longitudinal palliative care curriculum into obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) residency that could become standardized to ensure competencies in providing end of life (EOL) care.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted among 23 Ob-Gyn residents at a tertiary training hospital from 2021 to 2022. A curriculum intervention was provided via lecture and simulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Teaching death, spirituality, and palliative care to university students: Novel pedagogical approach.

Palliat Support Care

January 2025

Department of Theology and Religious Education, College of Liberal Arts, Manila, Philippines.

Teaching death, spirituality, and palliative care equips students with critical skills and perspectives for holistic patient care. This interdisciplinary approach fosters empathy, resilience, and personal growth while enhancing competence in end-of-life care. Using experiential methods like simulations and real patient interactions, educators bridge theory and practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Explore humanitarian healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions about implementing children's palliative care and to identify their educational needs and challenges, including learning topics, training methods, and barriers to education.

Methods: Humanitarian HCPs were interviewed about perspectives on children's palliative care and preferences and needs for training. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and arranged into overarching themes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!