A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Proposing the Clinical Inventory of Sleep Quality. | LitMetric

Proposing the Clinical Inventory of Sleep Quality.

Sleep Sci

Clinic of Sleep Disorders, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.

Published: October 2016

Introduction: The aim of the study was to propose the Clinical Inventory of Sleep Quality (CISQ), and compared it with the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI).

Methods: We studied 400 subjects with the CISQ. Cronbach's coefficient was calculated to measure the reliability, and to determine the concurrent validity, a Canonical correlation analysis was performed. At next, we used an exploratory and confirmatory Factorial analysis with Varimax rotation for validity construct calculation.

Results: Cronbach coefficient of the scale was significantly strong (α=0.81). Canonic correlation was=0.93, suggesting that data proved that the CISQ and PSQI are measuring identical subject. Confirmatory Factorial analysis model grouped items of the scale in four factors: 1. Daytime symptoms, 2. Nocturnal symptoms, 3. Sleep disordered breathing symptoms, and 4. Sleep-related movement disorders symptoms. We proposed five categories to score CISQ in a range of 0-52 points, as follows: Good quality of sleep, Mild bad sleep quality, Moderate bad sleep quality, Severe bad sleep quality, and Profound bad sleep quality.

Conclusion: CISQ is a promising tool to measure sleep quality and deserve more research to confirm its utility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5241619PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.slsci.2016.10.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sleep quality
28
bad sleep
16
sleep
10
clinical inventory
8
inventory sleep
8
quality
8
confirmatory factorial
8
factorial analysis
8
cisq
5
proposing clinical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!