Medicare Payments and Physician Sex in Ophthalmology.

JAMA Ophthalmol

Wheaton Eye Clinic Ltd, Wheaton, Illinois.

Published: March 2017

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicare payments
4
payments physician
4
physician sex
4
sex ophthalmology
4
medicare
1
physician
1
sex
1
ophthalmology
1

Similar Publications

Background: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 introduced the Meaningful Use program to incentivize the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in the U.S. This study investigates the disparities in EHR adoption and interoperability between rural and urban physicians in the context of federal programs like the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 and the 21st Century Cures Act.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Medicare insures over 65 million Americans and is a primary driver of private insurance reimbursement rates. However, public data shows Medicare reimbursement for comparatively complex procedures such as aortic aneurysm repair is disproportionate. Medicare reimbursement rates are multifactorial and highly localized, yet little is known about nationwide trends.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Many physician groups are in 2-sided risk payment arrangements with Medicare Advantage plans (at-risk MA). Analysis of quality and health resource use under such arrangements may inform ongoing Medicare policy concerning payment and service delivery.

Objective: To compare quality and efficiency measures under 2 payment models: at-risk MA and fee-for-service (FFS) MA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It has long been assumed that academic oncology practices are disadvantaged in value-based payment programs, due to patient complexity and research costs. This assumption not been tested. The Oncology Care Model (OCM) was a Medicare alternative payment model, which sought to curb costs while improving care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: More than 4 million Medicare beneficiaries have enrolled in dual-eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs), and coordination-only D-SNPs are common. Little is known about the impact of coordination-only D-SNPs on Medicaid-covered services and spending, including long-term services and supports, which are financed primarily by Medicaid.

Objective: To evaluate changes in Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) spending before and after new enrollment in coordination-only D-SNPs vs new enrollment in non-D-SNP Medicare Advantage (MA) plans among community-living beneficiaries enrolled in both Medicare and North Carolina Medicaid.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!