No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in MS should include CSF biology - Towards a 'Disease-Free Status Score'.

Mult Scler Relat Disord

Service de neurologie, Hôpital F. Mitterrand, 4 bd Hauterive, 64046 Pau, France.

Published: January 2017

The concept of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) was forged to describe relapse-free patients under treatment with recent drugs, but this goal is reached by less than half of all patients and not sustained over time. However a complete remission of disease is expected to be associated with the normalization of CSF biomarkers. On pathophysiological grounds, we propose to add the criterion of no evidence of biological activity in CSF to design a future 'disease-free status score'. This composite criterion, which should concern neurodegenerative and immune activation biomarkers, would be better suited for assessing the persistence of biological processes long before CNS atrophy occurs and should help in predicting long-term remission/progression of MS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2016.12.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evidence disease
8
disease activity
8
'disease-free status
8
status score'
8
activity neda
4
neda include
4
include csf
4
csf biology
4
biology 'disease-free
4
score' concept
4

Similar Publications

The Kidney Health Score: A Practical Guide to Early Detection of Kidney Disease Risk for Optimal Kidney Health.

Nephrol Nurs J

January 2025

Professor of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 10% of the global population, with increasing prevalence driven by diabetes, hypertension, and aging populations. CKD often progresses asymptomatically, frequently undetected until advanced stages, and may require costly treatments, such as dialysis or transplantation. CKD imposes a substantial financial burden on health care systems, with management costs rising sharply as the disease progresses, underscoring the need for early, cost-effective interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Macrolide resistance due to (55).

Microbiol Spectr

January 2025

Institute for Microbial Systems and Society, Faculty of Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Unlabelled: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat. The identification and characterization of novel resistance genes is integral to AMR surveillance. The (55) gene was originally identified through whole genome sequencing of macrolide-resistant strains of .

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prolonged incubation time unwarranted for acute periprosthetic joint infections.

J Clin Microbiol

January 2025

Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Unlabelled: Current laboratory protocols for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) involve a standard 10- to 14-day incubation period. However, recent evidence indicates considerable variability in the time to diagnosis (TTD) between acute and chronic PJIs. TTD is also influenced by the employed culture media and sample types.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multiple sclerosis and infection: history, EBV, and the search for mechanism.

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev

January 2025

Department of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Center for Virology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

SUMMARYInfection has long been hypothesized as the cause of multiple sclerosis (MS), and recent evidence for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as the trigger of MS is clear and compelling. This clarity contrasts with yet uncertain viral mechanisms and their relation to MS neuroinflammation and demyelination. As long as this disparity persists, it will invigorate virologists, molecular biologists, immunologists, and clinicians to ascertain how EBV potentiates MS onset, and possibly the disease's chronic activity and progression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In 2023, a breast cancer risk assessment and a subsequent positive test for the BRCA-2 genetic mutation brought me to the uncomfortable intersection of a longstanding career as an advocate for high-quality medical evidence to support shared patient-provider decision making and a new role as a high-risk patient. My search for studies of available risk-management options revealed that the most commonly recommended approach for women with a ⩾20% lifetime breast cancer risk, intensive screening including annual mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging beginning at age 25-40 years, was supported only by cancer-detection statistics, with almost no evidence on patient-centered outcomes-mortality, physical and psychological morbidity, or quality of life-compared with standard screening or a surgical alternative, bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. In this commentary, I explore parallels between the use of the intensive screening protocol and another longstanding women's health recommendation based on limited evidence, the use of hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal chronic disease prevention, which was sharply curtailed after the publication of the groundbreaking Women's Health Initiative trial in 2002.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!