Gastric antral webs in adults: A case series characterizing their clinical presentation and management in the modern endoscopic era.

Aim: To investigate the current management of gastric antral webs (GAWs) among adults and identify optimal endoscopic and/or surgical management for these patients.

Methods: We reviewed our endoscopy database seeking to identify patients in whom a GAW was visualized among 24640 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) over a seven-year period (2006-2013) at a single tertiary care center. The diagnosis of GAW was suspected during EGD if aperture size of the antrum did not vary with peristalsis or if a "double bulb" sign was present on upper gastrointestinal series. Confirmation of the diagnosis was made by demonstrating a normal pylorus distal to the GAW.

Results: We identified 34 patients who met our inclusion criteria (incidence 0.14%). Of these, five patients presented with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), four of whom underwent repeated sequential balloon dilations and/or needle-knife incisions with steroid injection for alleviation of GOO. The other 29 patients were incidentally found to have a non-obstructing GAW. Age at diagnosis ranged from 30-87 years. Non-obstructing GAWs are mostly incidental findings. The most frequently observed symptom prompting endoscopic work-up was refractory gastroesophageal reflux ( = 24, 70.6%) followed by abdominal pain ( = 11, 33.4%), nausea and vomiting ( = 9, 26.5%), dysphagia (n = 6, 17.6%), unexplained weight loss, ( = 4, 11.8%), early satiety ( = 4, 11.8%), and melena of unclear etiology ( = 3, 8.82%). Four of five GOO patients were treated with balloon dilation ( = 4), four-quadrant needle-knife incision ( = 3), and triamcinolone injection ( = 2). Three of these patients required repeat intervention. One patient had a significant complication of perforation after needle-knife incision.

Conclusion: Endoscopic intervention for GAW using balloon dilation or needle-knife incision is generally safe and effective in relieving symptoms, however repeat treatment may be needed and a risk of perforation exists with thermal therapies.