Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Crit Care Med

1St. George's Hospital London, England, United Kingdom. 2New York University School of Medicine New York, NY. 3McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4Brown University School of Medicine Providence, RI. 5Instituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 6Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona, Spain. 7University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 8Emory University Hospital Atlanta, GA. 9Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem, Israel. 10Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 11University of Pittsburgh Critical Care Medicine CRISMA Laboratory Pittsburgh, PA. 12Hospital Raymond Poincare Garches, France. 13Saint Thomas Hospital London, England, United Kingdom. 14University College London Hospitals London, England, United Kingdom. 15Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN. 16Service de Reanimation Medicale Paris, France. 17CHIREC Hospitals Braine L'Alleud, Belgium. 18Western Hospital Victoria, Australia. 19Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 20Vivantes-Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany. 21Karl Heusner Memorial Hospital Belize Healthcare Partners Belize City, Belize. 22Cooper Health System Camden, NJ. 23University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, MS. 24Jupiter Hospital Thane, India. 25Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL. 26ASAN Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul, South Korea. 27Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre, Brazil. 28Federal University of Sao Paulo Sao Paulo, Brazil. 29Regions Hospital St. Paul, MN. 30Saint Michael's Hospital Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 31Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO. 32Ottawa Hospital Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 33Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney Penrith, New South Wales, Australia. 34Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 35UCINC, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal. 36University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 37Università dellla Magna Graecia Catanzaro, Italy. 38Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aich, Japan. 39Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark. 40Università Sapienza, Rome, Italy. 41Christiana Care Health Services Newark, DE. 42University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA. 43Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA. 44Kaust Medical Services Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. 45University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City, KS. 46Wolfson Institute of Biomedical Research London, England, United Kingdom. 47Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA. 48California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco, CA. 49University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands. 50Erasmé University Hospital Brussels, Belgium. 51University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 52Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Published: March 2017

Objective: To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012."

Design: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

Methods: The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

Results: The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

Conclusions: Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sepsis septic
16
septic shock
16
management sepsis
12
surviving sepsis
8
sepsis campaign
8
guidelines management
8
international experts
8
patients sepsis
8
strong recommendations
8
sepsis
7

Similar Publications

Resuscitation in Paediatric Septic Shock Using Vitamin C and Hydrocortisone (RESPOND): The RESPOND Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.

Pediatr Crit Care Med

December 2024

Children's Intensive Care Research Program, Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Objectives: Pediatric sepsis results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is an urgent need to investigate adjunctive therapies that can be administered early. We hypothesize that using vitamin C combined with hydrocortisone increases survival free of inotropes/vasopressors support until day 7 compared with standard care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of completing 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation within 1 h in elderly septic shock patients.

Methods: This was a multicenter prospective observational cohort study. We applied logistic regression to assess the impact of completing 30 mL/kg fluid resuscitation within 1 h on respiratory support escalation including new-onset mechanical ventilation, bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as well as heart failure (HF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sinomenine modulates the metabolic reprogramming induced by sepsis via CHRNA7.

Life Sci

December 2024

State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, School of life science and technology, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211000, PR China. Electronic address:

Background And Purpose: Sepsis is a condition capable of causing systemic inflammation and metabolic reprogramming. Previous studies have shown that sinomenine (SIN) can mitigate sepsis by reducing inflammation, while the effect on metabolic reprogramming is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the function of SIN in metabolic reprogramming in sepsis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis is the result of a dysregulated immune response to infection and is associated with acute organ dysfunction. The syndrome's complexity is contingent upon the underlying pathology and individual patient characteristics, including their immune response. The involvement of multiple organs and physiological functions adds complexity, with "organ cross-talk" emerging as a pivotal pathophysiological and clinical aspect.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sepsis, a leading cause of mortality in intensive care units worldwide, lacks effective treatments for advanced-stage sepsis. Therefore, understanding the underlying mechanisms of this disease is crucial. This study reveals that invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells have an opposing role in the progression of sepsis by suppressing regulatory T (Treg) cell differentiation and function.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!