AI Article Synopsis

  • A community-based program called CARES in Toronto aimed to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among marginalized women, specifically immigrants and refugees who were less likely to get screened.
  • From May 2012 to October 2013, the program offered educational sessions in 20 languages, with 1,993 women attending, 35% of whom were never screened for Pap tests, and 48% for mammography.
  • The study found that CARES participants showed significantly higher screening rates—26% for Pap and 36% for mammography—compared to 9% and 14% for their matched controls, indicating the program's effectiveness in reaching under-screened populations.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Marginalized populations such as immigrants and refugees are less likely to receive cancer screening. Cancer Awareness: Ready for Education and Screening (CARES), a multifaceted community-based program in Toronto, Canada, aimed to improve breast and cervical screening among marginalized women. This matched cohort study assessed the impact of CARES on cervical and mammography screening among under-screened/never screened (UNS) attendees.

Methods: Provincial administrative data collected from 1998 to 2014 and provided in 2015 were used to match CARES participants who were age eligible for screening to three controls matched for age, geography, and pre-education screening status. Dates of post-education Pap and mammography screening up to June 30, 2014 were determined. Analysis in 2016 compared screening uptake and time to screening for UNS participants and controls.

Results: From May 15, 2012 to October 31, 2013, a total of 1,993 women attended 145 educational sessions provided in 20 languages. Thirty-five percent (118/331) and 48% (99/206) of CARES participants who were age eligible for Pap and mammography, respectively, were UNS on the education date. Subsequently, 26% and 36% had Pap and mammography, respectively, versus 9% and 14% of UNS controls. ORs for screening within 8 months of follow-up among UNS CARES participants versus their matched controls were 5.1 (95% CI=2.4, 10.9) for Pap and 4.2 (95%=CI 2.3, 7.8) for mammography. Hazard ratios for Pap and mammography were 3.6 (95% CI=2.1, 6.1) and 3.2 (95% CI=2.0, 5.3), respectively.

Conclusions: CARES' multifaceted intervention was successful in increasing Pap and mammography screening in this multiethnic under-screened population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pap mammography
20
screening
12
mammography screening
12
cares participants
12
cancer screening
8
screening cares
8
marginalized women
8
participants age
8
age eligible
8
mammography
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!