The current contribution seeks to start a conversation around our pedagogical practice in respect of abortion law. Centralising the traditional portrayal of abortion law within the medical law curriculum, this essay highlights the privileging of a very particular storyline about abortion. Exploring the terrain in evaluating medical law methodologies, this essay highlights the illusion of 'balance', 'objectivity', and 'neutrality' that emerges from current pedagogy in light of how abortion law is framed and in particular what is excluded: women's own voices. Focusing on a number of 'exclusions' and 'silences' and noting how closely these mirror dominant discourse in the public sphere, this essay highlights the irony of a curriculum that reflects, rather than challenges, these discursive gaps. Arguing that the setting of a curriculum is inevitably political, ambitions for delivering a programme around abortion that is 'neutral', 'objective', or 'balanced' are dismissed. Instead, highlighting the problems of what is currently excluded, how materials are ordered, and the tacit hierarchies that lend legitimacy and authority to a particular way of 'knowing' abortion, this essay argues for a new curriculum and a new storyline-one which is supported by prior learning in feminist legal scholarship and a medical law curriculum in which the social, historical, geographical, and above all, personal is ever-present and central.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww044 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Providing Interstate Telehealth Abortion Services to Patients in Restrictive States.
N Engl J Med
January 2025
From the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (C.S.), Harvard Law School (S.C.), Cambridge (M.C.), Massachusetts.
A national survey on Thai medical students' attitudes towards abortion and their confidence in providing abortion services following the amendment to abortion law.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X
March 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate medical students' attitudes towards abortion and their confidence in providing abortion services in the future.
Material And Methods: A national cross-sectional online survey was conducted among fifth and sixth-year medical students from 10 Thai universities. A self-administered questionnaire assessed their knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding abortion services.
Students' attitudes toward euthanasia and abortion: a cross-cultural study in three Mediterranean countries.
BMC Med Ethics
January 2025
Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Introduction: Abortion and euthanasia are still one of the greatest bioethical challenges. Previous studies have shown that there are differences in attitudes towards these issues depending on socio-demographic characteristics and socio-cultural environment (country of residence). As part of the scientific research project EuroBioMed, we compared the attitudes of students from three Mediterranean countries towards abortion and euthanasia and examined them from the perspective of Mediterranean bioethics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe complex landscape of abortion law and public health in Brazil.
Lancet Reg Health Am
February 2025
Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: The Requirement of Justification, The Moral Threshold, and Military Refusals.
J Relig Ethics
March 2024
Institute of Philosophy at Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland) and head of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics at Jagiellonian University, where he leads the project BIOUNCERTAINTY funded by a European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant.
A dogma accepted in many ethical, religious, and legal frameworks is that the reasons behind conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare cannot be evaluated or judged by any institution because conscience is individual and autonomous. This paper shows that this background view is mistaken: the requirement to reveal and explain the reasons for conscientious objection in healthcare is ethically justified and legally desirable. Referring to real healthcare cases and legal regulations, this paper argues that these reasons should be evaluated either ex ante or ex post and defends novel conceptual claims that have not been analyzed in the debates on CO.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!