Interventions that facilitate sustainable jobs and have a positive impact on workers' health: an overview of systematic reviews.

Rev Panam Salud Publica

Sustainable Development and Health Equity, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Published: November 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to identify interventions that create sustainable jobs in health sector workplaces while positively affecting worker health.
  • A systematic review method was used to analyze evidence from various studies, focusing on interventions that impact sustainable development and health outcomes in health sector environments.
  • Key positive interventions include enforcing safety regulations and offering flexible work arrangements, while negative impacts arise from downsizing, insecure work, and certain restructuring practices; therefore, careful implementation and evaluation of health-positive interventions are recommended.

Article Abstract

Objective: To identify interventions that facilitate sustainable jobs and have a positive impact on the health of workers in health sector workplaces.

Methods: This overview utilized systematic review methods to synthesize evidence from multiple systematic reviews and economic evaluations. A comprehensive search was conducted based on a predefined protocol, including specific inclusion criteria. To be classified as "sustainable," interventions needed to aim (explicitly or implicitly) to 1) have a positive impact on at least two key dimensions of the integrated framework for sustainable development and 2) include measures of health impact. Only interventions conducted in, or applicable to, health sector workplaces were included.

Results: Fourteen systematic reviews and no economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria for the overview. The interventions that had a positive impact on health included 1) enforcement of occupational health and safety regulations; 2) use of the "degree of experience rating" feature of workers' compensation; 3) provision of flexible working arrangements that increase worker control and choice; 4) implementation of certain organizational changes to shift work schedules; and 5) use of some employee participation schemes. Interventions with negative impacts on health included 1) downsizing/restructuring; 2) temporary and insecure work arrangements; 3) outsourcing/home-based work arrangements; and 4) some forms of task restructuring.

Conclusions: What is needed now is careful implementation, in health sector workplaces, of interventions likely to have positive impacts, but with careful evaluation of their effects including possible adverse impacts. Well-evaluated implementation of the interventions (including those at the pilot-study stage) will contribute to the evidence base and inform future action. Interventions with negative health impacts should be withdrawn from practice (through regulation, where possible). If use of these interventions is necessary, for other reasons, considerable care should be taken to ensure an appropriate balance between business needs and human health and well-being.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive impact
16
systematic reviews
12
health sector
12
health
11
interventions
10
interventions facilitate
8
facilitate sustainable
8
sustainable jobs
8
jobs positive
8
impact health
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!