Introduction: The on-the-road highway driving test is generally regarded as a gold standard for assessing drug-induced driving impairment. The primary outcome measure is the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a measure of road tracking error or "weaving". The test has been calibrated for incremental doses of alcohol almost 30 years ago in order to define the impact of drug-induced impairment in terms of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) equivalents. Drug-induced changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant ever since. The present analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the alcohol effect in a range of on-the-road driving studies which have been conducted since the initial alcohol calibration study.

Methods: The present study pooled data of 182 participants from nine placebo-controlled crossover studies who performed the highway driving test, while their BAC was at or just below the legal limit for drivers (i.e., 0.5 g/L).

Results: Overall, mean SDLP increased with 2.5 cm (95% CI 2.0-2.9 cm). Equivalence testing showed that the clinical relevance criterion value of 2.4 cm fell well within the 95% CI in each individual study. Gender did not affect alcohol-induced changes in SDLP.

Discussion: These results demonstrate the robustness and validity of the clinical relevance criterion for SDLP as measured during on-the-road driving.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306436PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-016-4519-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

highway driving
12
on-the-road highway
8
driving studies
8
standard deviation
8
deviation lateral
8
lateral position
8
blood alcohol
8
alcohol concentration
8
driving test
8
on-the-road driving
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!