Sex Differences in Hazard Ratio During Drug Treatment of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in Major Clinical Trials: A Focused Data Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Ther

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and BME-Campbell Clinic, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address:

Published: January 2017

Purpose: Understanding how sex impacts the efficacy of anticancer agents is a crucial step toward personalized and precision medicine. This review and meta-analysis evaluated sex differences in hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival and overall survival in representative Phase III clinical trials of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Data were extracted from 24 large-scale clinical trials that included 12,000 male and 7000 female patients. The data were examined for HR differences between subgroups by sex, smoking status, and age, and for potential sex-smoking status, sex-age, and sex-drug interactions, during cancer treatment.

Findings: Summarized information revealed variations in the influences of sex, smoking status, and age on the efficacy of drugs used for the treatment of NSCLC. The male and female subgroups had different HR values. Smoking status, age, and the percentage of female patients in a treatment group had no influence on the sex HR. The sex difference was supported by a set of data collected from all journals.

Implications: The findings from this meta-analysis are important for assessing potential toxicity during drug treatment in both sexes. The outcomes measures of a drug in clinical application should be specified by subpopulation, such as males versus females, as a first step in personalized medicine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.12.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trials
12
smoking status
12
status age
12
sex differences
8
differences hazard
8
drug treatment
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
review meta-analysis
8
step personalized
8

Similar Publications

Background: Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are both effective in treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). Impulsivity and impaired decision-making are prominent features of BPD, and therapeutic interventions targeting these symptoms could lead to significant improvements.

Objective/hypothesis: We hypothesized that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified rTMS protocol that targets the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, would enhance the therapeutic effects of DBT, leading to greater improvements in impulsivity and decision-making compared with sham stimulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Several approaches are being explored for engineering off-the-shelf chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. In this study, we engineered chimeric Fcγ receptor (FcγR) T cells and tested their potential as a versatile platform for universal T cell therapy.

Methods: Chimeric FcγR (CFR) constructs were generated using three distinct forms of FcγR, namely CD16A, CD32A, and CD64.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Current diagnostic imaging modalities have limited ability to differentiate between malignant and benign pancreaticobiliary disease, and lack accuracy in detecting lymph node metastases. F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is an imaging modality used for staging of prostate cancer, but has incidentally also identified PSMA-avid pancreatic lesions, histologically characterized as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This phase I/II study aimed to assess the feasibility of F-PSMA PET/CT to detect PDAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a global health concern with a rising prevalence, particularly in Brazil. Insulin therapy plays a crucial role in managing T2D, helping to maintain glucose and energy homeostasis. Moreover, early initiation of insulin is crucial for hyperglycemic control and prevention of chronic complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blinding is essential for mitigating biases in trials of low back pain (LBP). Our main objectives were to assess the feasibility of blinding: (1) participants randomly allocated to active or placebo spinal manual therapy (SMT), and (2) outcome assessors. We also explored blinding by levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP, and factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!