Background: The effects of bariatric surgery on excess weight loss (EWL) and comorbidities are proven. Still, a significant number of patients prefer conservative therapy (ConsP).

Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine why ConsP and patients awaiting bariatric surgery (SurgP) choose which therapy, and to define the differences in their expectations.

Setting: Prospective study, 1 university hospital, 1 general hospital, Germany.

Methods: ConsP and SurgP were asked to complete a questionnaire. Statistical analysis including all patients and a BMI-matched cohort was performed using the chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: Overall, 151 patients participated in this study (50 ConsP, 101 SurgP, 69.4% females). The mean age was 41.1 years (SD ± 12.2 years). ConsP had a significant lower body mass index (BMI, 44.7 kg/m vs. 49.3 kg/m, p < 0.01). The educational level was significantly higher in ConsP. SurgP suffered significantly more often from depression (21.6% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.02) and joint pain (45.1% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.02). ConsP completed significantly more diets that were supervised by physicians or considered well-structured (56.3% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.04). SurgP considered their chosen therapy a last resort significantly more often (p < 0.01). A BMI-matched analysis between ConsP and SurgP revealed no significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities but showed that fear of surgery plays a major role in the decision-making processes of obese patients.

Conclusion: A higher BMI and a greater prevalence of comorbidities had driven patients to seek a more radical solution for their obesity, i.e., surgery. The BMI-matched analysis suggests that fear of surgery is a relevant factor in why obese patients do not decide to undergo bariatric surgery lightly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2534-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bariatric surgery
8
patients
5
reason obese
4
obese patients
4
patients choose
4
choose conservative
4
conservative treatment
4
treatment surgery?
4
surgery? background
4
background effects
4

Similar Publications

Background: Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for severe pediatric obesity, but a subset of youth experience suboptimal weight loss and/or recurrent weight gain. Early re-initiation of obesity pharmacotherapy postoperatively may improve outcomes, though this has not been evaluated in pediatric populations.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care children's hospital evaluated the safety and efficacy of reintroducing obesity pharmacotherapy within six weeks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To investigate the effectiveness of different bariatric metabolic surgeries in improving metabolic syndrome indicators in patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on obese patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy + jejunojejunal bypass (LSG + JJB), and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Patients were categorized into groups based on their surgical procedure: LSG (N = 199), LSG + JJB (N = 242), and LRYGB (N = 288).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Globally, over 50% of the population is affected by , yet research on its prevalence and impact in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of infection in individuals with obesity undergoing LSG, evaluate the percentage of postoperative staple-line leaks, and explore the potential link between infection and staple-line leaks.

Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed adult patients with class III obesity who underwent LSG between 2015 and 2020 at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: (HP) is under investigation for its potential role in postoperative complications. While some studies indicate no impact, they often cite short or incomplete follow-up. This study aims to compare 1-year outcomes in groups with and without active HP infection after bariatric surgery, also assessing HP prevalence in postoperative specimens of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the degree to which pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) increases the risk of different types of biliary cancer (BC).

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct. We systematically searched from inception to April 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!