A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultraportable Oxygen Concentrator Use in U.S. Army Special Operations Forward Area Surgery: A Proof of Concept in Multiple Environments. | LitMetric

Introduction: A limitation to surgical care in an austere environment is the supply of oxygen to support mechanical ventilation and general anesthesia. Portable oxygen concentrators (OCs) offer an alternative to traditional compressed oxygen tanks.

Objectives: We set out to demonstrate that a low-pressure OC system could supply the mechanical ventilation needs in an austere operating environment.

Methods: An ultraportable OC (SAROS Model 3000, SeQual Technologies, Ball Ground, Georgia) was paired with an Impact 754 ventilator (Impact Instrumentation, West Caldwell, New Jersey) to evaluate the delivered fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) to a test lung across a range of minute ventilations and at altitudes of 1,200 and 6,500 feet above sea level.

Results: The compressor-driven Impact ventilator was able to deliver FiO at close to 0.9 for minute ventilations equal to oxygen flow. Pairing two OCs expanded the range of minute ventilations supported. OCs were less effective at concentrating oxygen at higher altitudes.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that low-pressure, ultraportable OCs are capable of delivering high FiO during mechanical ventilation in austere locations at both low and high altitudes. Ultraportable OCs could therefore be sufficient to support forward area surgical procedures and positively impact logistics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical ventilation
12
minute ventilations
12
forward area
8
demonstrate low-pressure
8
ventilation austere
8
range minute
8
ultraportable ocs
8
oxygen
6
ocs
5
ultraportable
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!