Background: Little empirical support exists for interrater reliability between evaluators from different backgrounds when assessing on-road outcomes of drivers.

Purpose: We quantified interrater reliability of on-road outcomes between a certified driving school instructor (DI) and an occupational therapist and certified driver rehabilitation specialist (CDRS).

Method: Both raters used the Global Rating Score (GRS) with two levels (pass, fail), the GRS with four levels (pass, pass with recommendations, fail remediable, fail), and the priority error rating score (PERS; most frequently occurring on-road errors in priority order) to assess 35 drivers (age, M = 48.31 years, SD = 9.76 years; 40% male; 86% with multiple sclerosis).

Findings: The DI and occupational therapist CDRS had excellent agreement on the GRS with two levels (κ = .892, p < .0001), GRS with four levels (κ = .952, p < .0001), and the PERS (κ = .847-.902, p < .0001), indicating interrater reliability.

Implications: This research contributes to empirical support for the on-road assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008417416663228DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

grs levels
16
interrater reliability
12
on-road assessment
8
empirical support
8
on-road outcomes
8
occupational therapist
8
rating score
8
levels pass
8
on-road
5
interrater
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!