Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps have become an attractive option for autologous breast reconstruction. The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the usual artery of choice for reconstruction. Unfortunately, there are certain situations when the IMA may not be suitable for usage as in previous radiation or diminutive size. Several options have been documented, such as using the thoracodorsal vessels. In this case report, we report usage of the distal and proximal ends of a contralateral single mammary artery to supply antegrade and retrograde flow to bilateral DIEP flaps. With increasing complexity of patient populations, the use of alternate approaches to recipient vessel in DIEP reconstruction becomes essential for effective outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5186226 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390085 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!