A controversial relationship between sigma-2 and progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) proteins, both representing promising targets for the therapy and diagnosis of tumors, exists since 2011, when the sigma-2 receptor was reported to be identical to PGRMC1. Because a misidentification of these proteins will lead to biased future research hampering the possible diagnostic and therapeutic exploitation of the two targets, there is the need to solve the debate on their identity. With this aim, we have herein investigated uptake and distribution of structurally different fluorescent sigma-2 receptor ligands by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in MCF7 cells, where together with intrinsic sigma-2 receptors, PGRMC1 was constitutively present or alternatively silenced or overexpressed. HCT116 cells, with constitutive or silenced PGRMC1, were also studied. These experiments showed that the fluorescent sigma-2 ligands bind to their receptor irrespective of PGRMC1 expression. Furthermore, isothermal titration calorimetry was conducted to examine if DTG and PB28, two structurally distinct nanomolar affinity sigma-2 ligands, bind to purified PGRMC1 proteins that have recently been revealed to form both apo-monomeric and heme-mediated dimeric forms. While no binding to apo-PGRMC1 monomer was detected, a micromolar affinity to heme-mediated dimerized PGRMC1 was demonstrated in DTG but not in PB28. The current data provide evidence that sigma-2 receptor and PGRMC1 are not identical, paving the pathway for future unbiased research in which these two attractive targets are treated as different proteins while the identification of the true sigma-2 protein further needs to be pursued.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2016.12.023 | DOI Listing |
J Prev Alzheimers Dis
November 2024
Anthony O. Caggiano, MD, PhD, Cognition Therapeutics, Inc., 2500 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, NY 10577,
Background: CT1812 is a first-in-class, sigma-2 receptor ligand, that prevents and displaces binding of amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomers. Normalization of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) markers suggests that CT1812 protects synapses from Aβ oligomer toxicity.
Objectives: Evaluate CT1812 impact on synaptic function using qEEG measurements.
J Med Chem
November 2024
Department of Pharmacy-Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via E. Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Pancreatic cancer, with its increasing incidence and lowest 5-year survival rate, is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer deaths by 2030. Current clinical trials have shown limited improvement, highlighting the need for new therapies. The sigma-2 receptor (S2R), with roles in tumor progression, is a target for novel thiosemicarbazones (TSCs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiochem Biophys Res Commun
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address:
TMEM97, also known as the sigma-2 receptor, plays a crucial role as an endoplasmic reticular protein involved in various physiological processes such as wound healing, and cholesterol metabolism. Moreover, TMEM97 has been implicated in multiple human diseases including neurodegenerative disorders and cancers. Histatin peptides are endogenous peptides with diverse biological effects, including antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and wound healing functions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Neurosurgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, GRC.
This study investigated the association of sigma receptors (SRs) and their selective ligands (because the molecular characteristics of the same SRs, particularly sigma-2 receptor {S2R}, are not completely clear) in carcinogenesis, their potential use as antitumor agents, and their great utility in tumor imaging. The ion channels and transporters enhance the cell's ability to adapt to the metabolic conditions encountered in the tumor tissue. The high expression of SRs in the proliferating cells compared with those at rest indicates that this is a significant clinical biomarker for determining the proliferative status of solid tumors using functional PET imaging techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Eye Res
December 2024
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Texas Eye Research Institute, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!