Background And Objectives: A "callback" requires patients to bring in take-home methadone doses for inspection. An opioid treatment program (OTP) quality-improvement project examined random versus "for-cause" callbacks.

Method: Eighty-two random callbacks and 60 for-cause callbacks were conducted among patients enrolled in an OTP (N = 183).

Results: Among patients with more take home doses, 6% of random callbacks versus 44% of for-cause callbacks were failed. Among patients with fewer take home doses, 36% of for-cause callbacks were failed.

Discussion And Conclusions: For-cause callbacks are more useful than random ones.

Scientific Significance: For-cause callbacks based on clinical judgment detect methadone misuse. (Am J Addict 2017;26:50-52).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

for-cause callbacks
20
opioid treatment
8
treatment program
8
methadone misuse
8
random callbacks
8
callbacks
7
for-cause
5
methadone
4
methadone "callbacks"
4
"callbacks" veterans
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!