Background And Objectives: A "callback" requires patients to bring in take-home methadone doses for inspection. An opioid treatment program (OTP) quality-improvement project examined random versus "for-cause" callbacks.
Method: Eighty-two random callbacks and 60 for-cause callbacks were conducted among patients enrolled in an OTP (N = 183).
Results: Among patients with more take home doses, 6% of random callbacks versus 44% of for-cause callbacks were failed. Among patients with fewer take home doses, 36% of for-cause callbacks were failed.
Discussion And Conclusions: For-cause callbacks are more useful than random ones.
Scientific Significance: For-cause callbacks based on clinical judgment detect methadone misuse. (Am J Addict 2017;26:50-52).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12479 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!