AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a new resorbable collagen membrane (CXP) with a reference membrane (BG) for bone regeneration around dental implants in areas prone to dehiscence (bone loss).
  • The trial involved 49 patients, showing that both membranes significantly reduced defect height, but CXP demonstrated a slightly greater bone gain and a lower rate of membrane exposure.
  • The findings suggest CXP is a viable alternative to BG for implant support, warranting further research to confirm these results.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare clinical performance of a new resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane, creos xenoprotect (CXP), with a reference membrane (BG) for guided bone regeneration at dehisced implant sites.

Materials And Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with expected dehiscence defects following implant placement to restore single teeth in the maxillary and mandibular esthetic zone and premolar area. Implants were placed using a two-stage surgical protocol with delayed loading. Bone augmentation material placed at the implant surface was immobilized with CXP or BG membrane. Soft tissue health was followed during the healing period, and the defect size was measured at reentry and 6 months after implant placement.

Results: Of the 49 included patients, 24 were treated with CXP and 25 with BG. Patient characteristics did not differ between the two arms. In the CXP arm, the defect height at implant insertion was (mean ± SD) 5.1 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24) and reduced at reentry by 81% to 1.0 ± 1.3 mm (n = 23). In the BG arm, the defect height at implant insertion was 4.9 ± 1.9 mm (n = 25) and reduced at reentry by 62% to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (n = 24). Assuming a margin of non-inferiority of 1 mm, CXP was non-inferior to BG. Membrane exposure rate was highest at week 3 in both arms, reaching 16.7% for BG and 8.7% for CXP.

Conclusions: The new resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane facilitates bone gain to support implant placement in expected dehiscence defects. The observed trend toward higher mean bone gain and lower exposure rate with CXP compared to BG should be further investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697637PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12995DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resorbable non-cross-linked
12
non-cross-linked collagen
12
collagen membrane
12
randomized controlled
8
controlled clinical
8
clinical trial
8
membrane guided
8
guided bone
8
bone regeneration
8
regeneration dehisced
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - The study compared open versus closed healing methods after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in dogs with damaged extraction sockets, using specific materials for the procedure.
  • - Results showed that the open group had quicker wound healing and maintained more keratinized tissue compared to the closed group, although the overall ridge dimensions and new bone formation were similar between both methods.
  • - In conclusion, while both healing approaches produced comparable outcomes in ridge dimensions and bone growth, open healing minimized buccal bone loss and enhanced keratinized tissue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To determine whether combining cross-linked (CL) collagen-integrated xenogeneic bone blocks stabilized with the fixation of resorbable collagen membranes (CM) can enhance guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the overaugmented calvarial defect model.

Materials And Methods: Four circular defects with a diameter of 8 mm were prepared in the calvarium of 13 rabbits. Defects were randomly assigned to receive one of the following treatments: (i) non-cross-linked (NCL) porcine-derived collagen-embedded bone block covered by a CM without fixation (NCL + unfix group); (ii) NCL bone block covered by CM with fixation using bone-tack (NCL + fix group); (iii) cross-linked (CL) porcine-derived collagen-embedded bone block covered by CM without fixation (CL + unfix group); and (iv) CL bone block covered by CM with fixation using bone-tack fixation (CL + fix group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The presence of a peri-implant bone dehiscence (BD) or fenestration (BF) is a common finding after implant placement in a crest with a reduced bucco-lingual bone dimension. The presence of a residual BD is associated with a relevant incidence of peri-implant biological complications over time. Guided bone regeneration (GBR), performed at implant placement, is the most validated treatment to correct a BD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In Vitro Evaluation of the Permeability of Different Resorbable Xenogeneic Membranes after Collagenolytic Degradation.

Membranes (Basel)

August 2022

Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

In this in vitro study, we compare the penetration of cells through different resorbable collagen membranes, which were collagenolytically degraded over different time periods. Three different resorbable collagen membranes were evaluated, including two non-cross-linked (NCL) membranes-namely, a porcine (NCL-P) and an equine (NCL-E) membrane-and an enzymatically cross-linked porcine (ECL-B) membrane. A special two-chamber model was fabricated, allowing for the placement of separating membranes, and a non-porous polyester membrane was used as a negative control (C), in order to verify the impermeability of the experimental chamber device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the local tissue reactions associated with 3 different poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) prototype membranes and to compare them to the reactions associated with commercially available resorbable membranes in rats.

Methods: Seven different membranes-3 synthetic PLGA prototypes (T1, T2, and T3) and 4 commercially available membranes (a PLGA membrane, a poly[lactic acid] membrane, a native collagen membrane, and a cross-linked collagen membrane)-were randomly inserted into 6 unconnected subcutaneous pouches in the backs of 42 rats. The animals were sacrificed at 4, 13, and 26 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!