Summative Assessments Using Simulation Requires Safeguards.

Anesth Analg

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Published: January 2017

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001699DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

summative assessments
4
assessments simulation
4
simulation requires
4
requires safeguards
4
summative
1
simulation
1
requires
1
safeguards
1

Similar Publications

Measuring Residents' Competence in Chest Tube Insertion on Thiel-Embalmed Bodies: A Validity Study.

Simul Healthc

December 2024

From the Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (L.D.M., I.V.H., L.D., W.W.); Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (I.V.H., L.D.); Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (P.V.d.V.); Department of Emergency Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (P.V.d.V.); Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium (H.V., W.W.); Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (L.K.); and Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark (L.K.).

Introduction: Chest tube insertions (CTIs) have a high complication rate, prompting the training of technical skills in simulated settings. However, assessment tools require validity evidence prior to their implementation. This study aimed to collect validity evidence for assessment of technical skills in CTI on Thiel-embalmed human bodies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A mixed method approach to substantiate quantitative data with qualitative data: Improving clinical judgment in prelicensure nursing students using simulation.

Nurse Educ Today

January 2025

University of Washington, United States; Capella University, United States; Bellevue College, United States; Marymount University, Arlington, VA, United States; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States. Electronic address:

Background: Current literature demonstrates a gap in research involving mixed method study of clinical judgment development in prelicensure nursing students.

Objectives: Clinical judgment of two groups of nursing students were compared using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).

Design: A mixed method convergent parallel quasi-experimental cross-sectional approach was used to determine if simulation increased clinical judgment skills between beginner and advanced pre-licensure nursing students.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Laparoscopic simulation has been used in many curricula. The United Kingdom (UK) surgical curriculum lacks summative assessment for laparoscopic skills. This study explores surgical trainees' perceptions of using simulated laparoscopic assessment as a summative tool in the UK.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality globally and a major contributor to disability. Traditional risk factors, as initially established in the FRAMINGHAM study, have helped to stratify populations and identify patients for early intervention. Incorporating genetic factors enhances risk stratification tools, enabling the earlier identification of individuals at increased risk and facilitating more targeted and effective risk factor modifications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!