Effects of Ambulation and Nondependent Transfers on Vital Signs in Patients Receiving Norepinephrine.

Am J Crit Care

Rosario Arcaya Nievera is a staff nurse, preceptor, and mentor in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, Missouri. Ann Fick is a certified cardiovascular and pulmonary clinical specialist at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and director of clinical education at Maryville University, St Louis, Missouri. Hilary K. Harris is the manager of the rehabilitation department at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

Published: December 2016

Purpose: To assess the safety of mobilizing patients receiving low-dose norepinephrine (0.05 μg/kg per min) by examining mean arterial pressure and heart rate before and after activity with parameters set by the physician.

Background: Norepinephrine is a peripheral vasoconstrictor administered for acute hypotension. During activity, blood flows to the periphery to supply muscles with oxygen, which may oppose the norepinephrine vasoconstriction. The safety of mobilizing patients receiving norepinephrine is unclear.

Methods: Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, norepinephrine dose, and activity performed were extracted retrospectively from charts of 47 cardiothoracic surgery patients during the first patient transfer to chair or ambulation with norepinephrine infusing. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were compared before and after physical therapy (paired t tests). Differences among norepinephrine doses and physical activity levels were evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis test).

Results: Forty-one of the 47 patients (87%) tolerated the activity within safe ranges of vital signs. The change in patients' mean arterial pressure from before to after activity was not significant (P = .16), but a significant increase in heart rate occurred after activity (P < .001). A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in the norepinephrine dose and activity level (χ = 6.34, P = .17). No instances of cardiopulmonary or respiratory arrest occurred during any physical therapy sessions.

Conclusions: Infusion of low-dose norepinephrine should not be considered an automatic reason to keep patients on bed rest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017384DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arterial pressure
16
heart rate
16
patients receiving
12
norepinephrine
10
vital signs
8
receiving norepinephrine
8
safety mobilizing
8
mobilizing patients
8
low-dose norepinephrine
8
pressure heart
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!