Objective: An increasing number of studies have been reported since the "Da Vinci" Robotic System was used in gastrointestinal disease. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic colectomy (RC) compared with laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in the treatment of colon cancer.
Method: A systematic search of Medline, Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies that compared RC and LC and were published up to February 2015. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, the fixed or the random-effect model was used for the meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest included the operating time, blood loss, the length of hospital stay, conversion rates to open, postoperative complications, and related outcomes were evaluated.
Results: Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. These studies involved a total of 125,989 patients: 4924 of them underwent RC and 121,055 underwent LC. The meta-analysis showed that the RC group had a longer operating time (P<0.01), lower blood loss (P<0.01), lower intraoperative conversion to open rate (P<0.01), shorter hospital stay (P<0.01), lower postoperative complication rate (P<0.01), and significantly faster bowel function recovery (P<0.01). There were no differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested (P>0.05).
Conclusions: Our data suggest that RC may be a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive alternative to its LC counterpart when performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients. However, the long-term outcomes between the 2 techniques need to be further examined.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000359 | DOI Listing |
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Department of Anatomy, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Objective: To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.
Design: Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.
Setting: Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.
Updates Surg
January 2025
TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Stoma reversal surgery is known for relatively high complication rates. While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are extensively validated for colorectal surgery, their use in stoma reversal remains underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates clinical outcomes of stoma reversal surgery under ERAS protocols compared to standard care (SC) practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
January 2025
Advanced Medical Devices Laboratory, Kyushu University, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0382, Japan.
Purpose: This paper presents a deep learning approach to recognize and predict surgical activity in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS). Our primary objective is to deploy the developed model for implementing a real-time surgical risk monitoring system within the realm of RAMIS.
Methods: We propose a modified Transformer model with the architecture comprising no positional encoding, 5 fully connected layers, 1 encoder, and 3 decoders.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)
January 2025
Swedish Board Member of General Surgery, Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties, Erbil, Iraq.
The rising global incidence of syphilis underscores the risk of transmission through blood transfusions. Treponema pallidum, the pathogen responsible for syphilis, represents a major public health challenge. Accurate detection is essential for controlling the disease, particularly in asymptomatic blood donors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Periodontal Res
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Aim: To investigate additional factors contributing to the pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis and periodontitis beyond the systemic immune suppression caused by the chemotherapeutic agent 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU).
Methods: 5-Fluorouracil was topically delivered to the non-keratinized, rapidly proliferating junctional epithelium (JE) surrounding the dentition, and acts as an immunologic and functional barrier to bacterial ingression. Various techniques, including EdU incorporation, quantitative immunohistochemistry (qIHC), histology, enzymatic activity assays, and micro-computed tomographic (μCT) imaging, were employed to analyze the JE at multiple time points following topical 5-FU treatment.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!