A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Release of saccades in schizophrenics: inattention or inefficiency? | LitMetric

Release of saccades in schizophrenics: inattention or inefficiency?

Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci

Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Published: November 1989

AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper explores the differences between inattention and inefficiency as reasons behind eye movement issues in schizophrenic patients, focusing on how they make quick eye movements in various scenarios.
  • It finds that reductions in eye movement problems occur across all subjects, not just schizophrenic ones, suggesting the issue isn't solely due to attentional deficits.
  • The study concludes that the eye movement deficiencies in schizophrenia are likely influenced more by processing inefficiencies rather than a common inattentional problem.

Article Abstract

This paper attempts to distinguish between inattention and inefficiency as the cause of the eye movement problems of schizophrenic subjects. It focuses on their release of fast saccadic eye movements in four different situations: interrupting smooth tracking, as double-jumps in refixation, and as inadvertent departures from steady fixation or too-early prediction moves. If an attention deficit causes saccades during tracking, they should be reduced only for schizophrenic subjects in the dark, when there is no contrasting background. Instead the reduction was present for all groups. If double-jumps in saccadic refixations were caused by inattentional instability, they should increase in schizophrenic subjects when the target is a temporary flash of light. Instead, they were reduced in all groups to almost none, suggesting a perceptual processing cause for the excess double jumps. If a global attentional problem of schizophrenia caused saccade release, saccade number should be correlated across the four situations. Instead, there were significant correlations only between departures and predictions in paranoid schizophrenic subjects (r = 0.728) and between predictions and looking in nonparanoid schizophrenic subjects (r = -0.855). This lack of over-all correlations suggests that a common inattentional problem does not produce these eye movement deficiencies. Instead, the perceptual influence on tracking and looking suggests that processing inefficiency is responsible for at least part of the deficit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01739739DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

schizophrenic subjects
20
eye movement
8
schizophrenic
5
subjects
5
release saccades
4
saccades schizophrenics
4
schizophrenics inattention
4
inattention inefficiency?
4
inefficiency? paper
4
paper attempts
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!