A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Implantation of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes: A Systematic Review. | LitMetric

Implantation of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes: A Systematic Review.

J Clin Neurophysiol

*"Claudio Munari" Center for Epilepsy Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, Milan, Italy; and †Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.

Published: December 2016

Background: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was developed by Talairach and Bancaud in Paris in the late 1950s. Subsequently, the Talairach methodology was adopted at a number of additional centers in Europe and Canada. Technical aspects remained essentially unchanged for the following 30 years. Only in the last two decades, because of advancements in image-guided surgery systems, robotics, and computer-aided planning, use of SEEG has become more widespread, and reports describing these new developments have been published.

Objectives: This systematic review was designed to assess published reports of SEEG surgical techniques and safety profile.

Data Sources: An electronic search was performed of Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. In addition, the content pages of several standard epilepsy surgery textbooks were searched. Full-text English studies describing SEEG surgical technique or pertinent epidemiological data were included. Conference abstracts, reviews, posters, editorials, comments, and letters were excluded.

Results: Three hundred fifty-nine of 2,903 potentially eligible studies published by 32 centers were reviewed. Thirty-one of these primarily discussed the surgical technique. Thirty-five major complications (including 4 fatalities) were reported among 4,000 patients (0.8%) implanted with 33,000 electrodes.

Limitations: The number of SEEG patients is likely to be underestimated because only a few groups have exhaustively reported their experience. Moreover, it is possible that a number of teams performing SEEG have not published studies on the topic.

Conclusions: Rigorous SEEG, thanks to its basic principles and updated technologies, is a safe and accurate method to define the epileptogenic zone by means of stereotactically implanted intracerebral electrodes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
8
seeg surgical
8
surgical technique
8
seeg
7
implantation stereoelectroencephalography
4
stereoelectroencephalography electrodes
4
electrodes systematic
4
review background
4
background stereoelectroencephalography
4
stereoelectroencephalography seeg
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!