Background: Recurrence of glenohumeral dislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair can be associated with a large osseous defect in the posterosuperior part of the humeral head. Our hypothesis is that remplissage is more effective to prevent recurrence of glenohumeral instability without a severe motion deficit.

Methods: Engaging Hill-Sachs lesions were observed in 48 of 737 patients (6.5%). Twenty-four patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage (group I) and the other 24 patients underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair alone (group II). Clinical outcomes were prospectively evaluated by assessing the range of motion. Complications, recurrence rates, and functional results were assessed utilizing the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, and the Korean Shoulder Score for Instability (KSSI) score. Capsulotenodesis healing after remplissage was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: The average ASES, Rowe, and KSSI scores were statistically significantly higher in group I than group II. The frequency of recurrence was statistically significantly higher in group II. The average loss in external rotation measured with the arm positioned at the side of the trunk was greater in group II and that in abduction was also higher in group II.

Conclusions: Compared to single arthroscopic Bankart repair, the remplissage procedure combined with arthroscopic Bankart repair was more effective to prevent the recurrence of anterior shoulder instability without significant impact on shoulder mobility in patients who had huge Hill-Sachs lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114256PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.428DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bankart repair
28
arthroscopic bankart
20
hill-sachs lesions
12
higher group
12
engaging hill-sachs
8
recurrence glenohumeral
8
effective prevent
8
prevent recurrence
8
patients underwent
8
underwent arthroscopic
8

Similar Publications

Background: Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain. Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies, such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA) lesions are associated with recurrent shoulder instability and higher rates of failure after capsulolabral repair compared with similarly treated Bankart lesions. Although these lesions can portend poor outcomes, there are limited data on the associated conditions and postoperative course in a young, active population.

Purpose: To evaluate the mid- to long-term clinical course and failure rates after ALPSA repairs and assess features associated with these outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate, range of motion (ROM) and return to sport between arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (BR) and open Bankart repair with inferior capsular shift (OBICS) in contact and collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study of 90 patients separated into two study groups (OBICS and BR) of 45 collision and contact athletes each was conducted. All athletes had subcritical glenoid bone loss (SGBL) ≤ 10% and off-track Hill Sach lesions (HSLs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To analyze how patient history, glenoid bone loss (GBL), and the size of the residual glenoid bone fragment (GBF) influence the choice between arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedure in patients with anteroinferior glenohumeral instability and bony Bankart lesions.

Methods: Review of 290 patients with bony Bankart lesions treated for anterior glenohumeral instability was conducted and patients were categorized into three groups based on GBL and GBF: Group A (GBL < 10% and GBF <10%), Group B (GBL ≥ 10% and GBF <10%), and Group C (GBL ≥10%, GBF ≥10%). Number of preoperative dislocations, time from the first instability, Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI) scores, Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) location (central or peripheral), HSL track status, and Glenoid Track Instability Management Score (GTIMS) were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!