Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Short informations with graphic elements may support self management of symptoms. Enhancing self-management is a key element of cancer care. Since 2011 different organisations have been developing patient education handouts, the so called symptom navi with three different graphical variants and slightly different text. Aim: To lay ground for a Swiss-wide standard of the symptom navi, we evaluated (a) the utility of the sheets and (b) the preference for the graphical layout and c) complexity of provided text with patients, their relatives, and health professionals. Methods: We conducted three focus groups with 14 patients and one relative, and an online-survey with 16 health professionals. Descriptive data analysis were combined with thematic analysis of qualitative data. Results: Overall, the symptom navi were well received by patients and health professionals. All participants welcomed the conciseness of information and requested information was easy to find. The structure of the symptom navi supported the readability and facilitated the self-assessment of a patients’ condition. Smileys to support the evaluation of symptom burden was the most favoured graphic layout. For patients, the graduation of the severity of symptoms with different colours supported their feelings of safety. However, symptom navi do not substitute personal contact and counselling. Conclusions: The most favoured graphical layout will now be further developed and refined. A future evaluation will investigate the content validity of the symptom navi.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000518 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!