AI Article Synopsis

  • Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is marked by motor and vocal tics, often linked to OCD, and shows reduced plasticity in the primary motor cortex when stimulated.
  • The study explored how the BDNF gene polymorphism affects plasticity responses in GTS patients compared to healthy controls, revealing that both groups exhibited similar responses regardless of BDNF genotype.
  • Results showed GTS patients did not experience the expected plastic changes from stimulation, indicating a unique neurophysiological response linked to the syndrome itself.

Article Abstract

Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is characterized by motor and vocal tics and often associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Responses to intermittent/continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS/cTBS), which probe long-term potentiation (LTP)-/depression (LTD)-like plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1), are reduced in GTS. ITBS-/cTBS-induced M1 plasticity can be affected by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) polymorphism. We investigated whether the BDNF polymorphism influences iTBS-/cTBS-induced LTP-/LTD-like M1 plasticity in 50 GTS patients and in 50 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. In GTS patients, motor and psychiatric (OCD) symptom severity was rated using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). We compared M1 iTBS-/cTBS-induced plasticity in healthy subjects and in patients with GTS. We also compared responses to TBS according to BDNF polymorphism (Val/Val vs Met carriers) in patients and controls. Fourteen healthy subjects and 13 GTS patients were Met carriers. When considering the whole group of controls, as expected, iTBS increased whereas cTBS decreased MEPs. Differently, iTBS/cTBS failed to induce LTP-/LTD-like plasticity in patients with GTS. When comparing responses to TBS according to BDNF polymorphism, in healthy subjects, Met carriers showed reduced MEP changes compared with Val/Val individuals. Conversely, in patients with GTS, responses to iTBS/cTBS were comparable in Val/Val individuals and Met carriers. YGTSS and Y-BOCS scores were comparable in Met carriers and in Val/Val subjects. We conclude that iTBS and cTBS failed to induce LTP-/LTD-like plasticity in patients with GTS, and this was not affected by BDNF genotype.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4847-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

met carriers
20
ltp-/ltd-like plasticity
16
bdnf polymorphism
16
healthy subjects
16
patients gts
16
gts patients
12
gts
9
plasticity primary
8
primary motor
8
motor cortex
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!