A radiographic analysis of cage positioning in lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.

J Orthop

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.

Published: March 2017

Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion (DLIF) and eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) are the most common surgical platforms available for performing transpsoas spinal fusion but no study has been carried out to compare them. We evaluated 21 DLIF and 22 XLIF cage positions by measuring the distance between the posterior vertebral border and the centre of the cage normalised to the midsagittal length of the inferior end plate. We found that DLIF cages were significantly more anteriorly located than XLIF (0.65 vs 0.52,  = 0.001) at L4-5, suggesting that XLIF would permit implantation of wider cages than DLIF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123043PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.10.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interbody fusion
12
lumbar interbody
8
radiographic analysis
4
analysis cage
4
cage positioning
4
positioning lateral
4
lateral transpsoas
4
transpsoas lumbar
4
fusion
4
fusion direct
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!