Potential model for differential diagnosis between Crohn's disease and primary intestinal lymphoma.

World J Gastroenterol

Tian-Yu Zhang, Yun Lin, Rong Fan, Shu-Rong Hu, Meng-Meng Cheng, Mao-Chen Zhang, Li-Wen Hong, Xiao-Lin Zhou, Zheng-Ting Wang, Jie Zhong, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

Published: November 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to find effective parameters that can help distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) from primary intestinal lymphoma (PIL) using patient data.
  • Researchers analyzed medical records from 85 CD patients and 56 PIL patients, focusing on demographic, clinical, and imaging data to create a model for differentiation.
  • The results showed that specific factors such as age, symptoms, laboratory values, endoscopic findings, and imaging characteristics could accurately differentiate the two conditions, achieving high sensitivity and specificity rates in the diagnostic model.

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of different parameters to differentiate Crohn's disease (CD) from primary intestinal lymphoma (PIL).

Methods: The medical records of 85 patients with CD and 56 patients with PIL were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and computed tomographic enterography (CTE) parameters were collected. The univariate value of each parameter was analyzed. A differentiation model was established by pooling all the valuable parameters. Diagnostic efficacy was analyzed, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted.

Results: The demographic and clinical parameters that showed significant values for differentiating CD from PIL included age of onset, symptom duration, presence of diarrhea, abdominal mass, and perianal lesions ( < 0.05). Elevated lactate dehydrogenase and serum β2-microglobulin levels suggested a PIL diagnosis ( < 0.05). The endoscopic parameters that showed significant values for differentiating CD from PIL included multiple-site lesions, longitudinal ulcer, irregular ulcer, and intraluminal proliferative mass ( < 0.05). The CTE parameters that were useful in the identification of the two conditions included involvement of ≤ 3 segments, circular thickening of the bowel wall, wall thickness > 8 mm, aneurysmal dilation, stricture with proximal dilation, "comb sign", mass showing the "sandwich sign", and intussusceptions ( < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the differentiation model were 91.8%, 96.4%, 93.6%, 97.5%, and 88.5%, respectively. The cutoff value was 0.5. The area under the ROC curve was 0.989.

Conclusion: The differentiation model that integrated the various parameters together may yield a high diagnostic efficacy in the differential diagnosis between CD and PIL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5107705PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i42.9411DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differentiation model
12
differential diagnosis
8
crohn's disease
8
disease primary
8
primary intestinal
8
intestinal lymphoma
8
demographic clinical
8
cte parameters
8
diagnostic efficacy
8
roc curve
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!