AI Article Synopsis

  • Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, is a chronic infection mainly impacting the skin and nerves, with diagnosis traditionally based on clinical evaluation and supported by histopathological analysis.
  • A study analyzed 126 skin biopsies and 25 slit skin smears using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and routine bacilloscopy to compare diagnostic effectiveness, finding qPCR to be highly sensitive and specific.
  • The qPCR technique demonstrated 84.9% sensitivity in skin biopsies and 100% specificity, suggesting it is a reliable complementary diagnostic tool for leprosy across all clinical forms.

Article Abstract

Leprosy, whose etiological agent is Mycobacterium leprae, is a chronic infectious disease that mainly affects the skin and peripheral nervous system. The diagnosis of leprosy is based on clinical evaluation, whereas histopathological analysis and bacilloscopy are complementary diagnostic tools. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), a current useful tool for diagnosis of infectious diseases, has been used to detect several pathogens including Mycobacterium leprae. The validation of this technique in a robust set of samples comprising the different clinical forms of leprosy is still necessary. Thus, in this study samples from 126 skin biopsies (collected from patients on all clinical forms and reactional states of leprosy) and 25 slit skin smear of leprosy patients were comparatively analyzed by qPCR (performed with primers for the RLEP region of M. leprae DNA) and routine bacilloscopy performed in histological sections or in slit skin smear. Considering clinical diagnostic as the gold standard, 84.9% of the leprosy patients were qPCR positive in skin biopsies, resulting in 84.92% sensitivity, with 84.92 and 61.22% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Concerning bacilloscopy of histological sections (BI/H), the sensitivity was 80.15% and the PPV and NPV were 80.15 and 44.44%, respectively. The concordance between qPCR and BI/H was 87.30%. Regarding the slit skin smear, 84% of the samples tested positive in the qPCR. Additionally, qPCR showed 100% specificity, since all samples from different mycobacteria, from healthy individuals, and from other granulomatous diseases presented negative results. In conclusion, the qPCR technique for detection of M. leprae using RLEP primers proved to be specific and sensitive, and qPCR can be used as a complementary test to diagnose leprosy irrespective of the clinical form of disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9425481PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.09.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

slit skin
16
skin smear
16
mycobacterium leprae
12
clinical forms
12
qpcr
9
leprosy
8
smear leprosy
8
forms leprosy
8
skin biopsies
8
leprosy patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!