Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: High-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) is widely used for patients with acute respiratory failure. HFNC has a number of physiological effects. Although F is considered to be constant, because HFNC is an open system, F varies according to inspiratory flow, tidal volume (V), and HFNC gas flow. We investigated the influence of HFNC gas flow and other respiratory parameters on F during HFNC.
Methods: We evaluated an HFNC system and, for comparison, a conventional oxygen therapy system. The HFNC apparatus was composed of an air/oxygen blender, a heated humidifier, an inspiratory limb, and small, medium, and large nasal prongs. HFNC gas flow was set at 20, 40, and 60 L/min, and F was set at 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7. We measured F for 1-min intervals using an oxygen analyzer and extracted data for the final 3 breaths of each interval. Spontaneous breathing was simulated using a mechanical ventilator connected to the muscle compartment of a model lung. The lung compartment passively moved with the muscle compartment, thus inspiring ambient air via a ventilator limb. With a decelerating flow waveform, simulated V was set at 300, 500, and 700 mL, breathing frequency at 10 and 20 breaths/min, and inspiratory time at 1.0 s.
Results: With HFNC gas flow of 20 and 40 L/min, at all set F values, inspiratory oxygen concentration varied with V (P < .001). As the set value for F increased, the difference between set F and measured F increased. Neither breathing frequency nor prong size influenced F .
Conclusions: During HFNC with simulated spontaneous breathing, when HFNC gas flow was 60 L/min, measured F was similar to set F at 0.3 and 0.5, whereas at 0.7, as V increased, measured F decreased slightly. However, at 20 or 40 L/min, changes in V related with deviation from set F .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04963 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!