A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Irosustat Versus Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

Int J Gynecol Cancer

*Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; †Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; ‡Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; §Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic; ‖Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej, Lublin, Poland; ¶Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; #City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St Petersburg, Russia; **Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; ††Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; ‡‡Vilnius University Institute of Oncology, Vilnius, Lithuania; §§Oncology Centre of Latvia, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; ‖‖Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France; and ¶¶Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, University of Liverpool, Bebington, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

Published: February 2017

Objective: Advanced/metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Malignant endometrial tissue has high steroid sulphatase (STS) activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate STS as a therapeutic target in patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods: This was a phase 2, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm study of the STS inhibitor oral irosustat 40 mg/d versus oral megestrol acetate 160 mg/d in women with advanced/metastatic or recurrent estrogen receptor-positive endometrial cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients without progression or death 6 months after start of treatment. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, and safety.

Results: Seventy-one patients were treated (36 with irosustat, 35 with megestrol acetate). The study was prematurely stopped after futility analysis. Overall, 36.1% and 54.1% of patients receiving irosustat or megestrol acetate had not progressed or died at 6 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between irosustat and megestrol acetate in response and overall survival rates. Irosustat patients had a median progression-free survival of 16 weeks (90% confidence interval, 9.0-31.4) versus 40 weeks (90% confidence interval, 16.3-64.0) in megestrol acetate patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (55.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients receiving irosustat or megestrol, respectively. Most adverse events in both groups were grade 1 or 2.

Conclusions: Although irosustat monotherapy did not attain a level of activity sufficient for further development in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, this study confirms the activity of hormonal treatment (megestrol acetate) for this indication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000862DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

megestrol acetate
28
endometrial cancer
16
irosustat megestrol
16
irosustat
8
megestrol
8
advanced/metastatic recurrent
8
patients
8
progression-free survival
8
patients receiving
8
receiving irosustat
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!