A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Evaluation of Appropriate Readout Sequence for Renal MRI Perfusion Using ASTAR (ASL) Technique]. | LitMetric

[Evaluation of Appropriate Readout Sequence for Renal MRI Perfusion Using ASTAR (ASL) Technique].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University.

Published: April 2017

The aim of this study was to compare true-steady state free precession (True-SSFP) with fast field echo (FFE) as readout imaging sequences for renal arterial spin labeling (ASL), and to optimize the imaging condition. Renal ASL perfusion images were acquired using signal targeting with alternated radio frequency using asymmetric inversion slab (ASTAR) technique with respiratory triggering at 3T MRI system, using either 3D True-SSFP or FFE as the readout sequence. Inversion time (TI) varied from 800 to 2400 ms. Appropriate flip angles were estimated for each sequence by simulating signal intensity (SI). The SI of the renal cortex, vertebral body, and intestinal tract were measured, and the contrast ratio of the cortex (CR) or intestine (CR) related to vertebra was calculated. The image quality of the kidneys, background signal suppression, and misregistration were evaluated by four-point scales. As a result, in quantitative evaluation, the average of CR of each TI (800, 1200, 1600, 2000, and 2400 msec) were 0.49, 0.57, 0.63, 0.63, and 0.56 in FFE, and 0.59, 0.71, 0.73, 0.73, and 0.68 in True-SSFP, respectively. IN qualitative evaluation, ASL images with True-SSFP readout were significantly better than those with FFE readout. In conclusion, True-SSFP sequences will be recommended as read out imaging sequence for obtaining ASL image compared with FFE image.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2016_JSRT_72.11.1105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ffe readout
12
readout sequence
8
readout
5
asl
5
true-ssfp
5
ffe
5
[evaluation appropriate
4
appropriate readout
4
sequence
4
renal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!