Purpose: We aimed to investigate juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients complaining of tremor unrelated to valproate (VPA) treatment and evaluate if there were differences between JME patients with and without tremor and essential tremor (ET) patients to exclude comorbidity.

Methods: Fifteen JME cases with the complaint of tremor, 14 JME patients without tremor, 14 patients with ET and 14 healthy subjects (HS) were included. Regularity, frequency and amplitude of the tremor and superimposed myoclonia were assessed by accelerometric analysis. Cortical SEPs evoked by the stimulation of the median nerve were recorded bilaterally. Clinical and neurophysiologic features were statistically compared between the groups.

Findings: Amplitude of postural tremor of the left hand was significantly increased in the ET group compared to JME patients with tremor, but there were no differences regarding to frequency. Strikingly, there were superimposed irregular, low-amplitude inconstant myoclonic jerks located to distal part of the fingers in JME group with tremor. Initial frequency of myoclonic seizures was also significantly higher in this group compared to JME patients without tremor but this difference disappeared after treatment. The group of JME with tremor had the highest N20-P25 and P25-N35 amplitudes, followed by JME without tremor, ET and HS, respectively.

Conclusion: Tremulous hand movements in JME resembled ET, but their amplitude was lower and characterized with accompanying irregular myoclonic jerks. The presence of tremor in JME patients should be taken into consideration to create more homogeneous groups in genetic and pathophysiological studies of JME.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jme patients
24
patients tremor
16
tremor
13
jme
12
juvenile myoclonic
8
myoclonic epilepsy
8
patients
8
tremor patients
8
tremor jme
8
group compared
8

Similar Publications

Background: Learning health systems (LHS) have the potential to use health data in real time through rapid and continuous cycles of data interrogation, implementing insights to practice, feedback, and practice change. However, there is a lack of an appropriately skilled interprofessional informatics workforce that can leverage knowledge to design innovative solutions. Therefore, there is a need to develop tailored professional development training in digital health, to foster skilled interprofessional learning communities in the health care workforce in Australia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently.

Methods: The Merative MarketScan® Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the UK, the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) is a widely used process, designed to facilitate shared decision-making between a clinician and a patient or, if the patient lacks capacity to participate in the conversation, a person close to the patient. A key outcome of the ReSPECT process is a set of recommendations, recorded on the patient-held ReSPECT form, that reflect the conversation. In an emergency, these recommendations are intended to inform clinical decision-making, and thereby enable the attending clinician-usually a general practitioner (GP) or paramedic-to act in the patient's best interests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When the patient can't walk away.

J Med Ethics

January 2025

Rehabilitation Medicine, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

When the clinician and patient are unable to reconcile differences over treatment, does this mean the latter lacks capacity to decide in such matters? Wellesley analyse the legal judgements in the case of Ms Sudiksha Thirumalesh where, on the particulars, the Court of Protection answered yes, only for the Court of Appeal to disagree. The authors highlight concerns about using isolated false belief as an indicator of incapacity and advise that such matters may be better resolved by greater discussion of the benefits and burdens of treatment, alongside consideration of their costs. Here, I suggest that a disability perspective is also helpful to such cases, recognising that this was a disagreement from which the patient couldn't walk away.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records ("open notes"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!