AI Article Synopsis

  • The study was a prospective, cross-sectional analysis aimed at understanding which radiographic features impacted patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with symptomatic lumbar scoliosis.
  • Prior research hinted at links between PROs and certain spinal alignment measurements, but this study focused exclusively on first-time presentations of scoliosis rather than those with previous surgeries.
  • The analysis involved 286 patients, examining their radiographic data and PRO scores, finding only weak correlations between spine alignment and patient-reported symptoms, with more notable differences appearing in patients with higher levels of disability.

Article Abstract

Study Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine which radiographic parameters drive patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in primary presentation adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS).

Summary Of Background Data: Previous literature suggests correlations between PROs and sagittal plane deformity (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch, pelvic tilt [PT]). Prior work included revision and primary adult spinal deformity patients. The present study addresses only primary presentation ASLS.

Methods: Prospective baseline data were analyzed on 286 patients enrolled in an NIH RO1 clinical trial by nine centers from 2010 to 2014.

Inclusion Criteria: 40 to 80 years old, lumbar Cobb (LC) 30° or higher and Scoliosis Research Society-23 score 4.0 or less in Pain, Function or Self-Image domains, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 20 or higher. Patients were primary presentation (no prior spinal deformity surgery) and had complete baseline data: standing coronal/sagittal 36" radiographs and PROs (ODI, Scoliosis Research Society-23, Short Form-12). Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relations between radiographic parameters and PROs for the study population and a subset of patients with ODI 40 or higher. Analysis of variance was used to identify differences in PROs for radiographic modifier groups.

Results: Mean age was 60.3 years. Mean spinopelvic parameters were: LL = -39.2°; SVA = 3.1 cm; sacral slope = 32.5°; PT = 23.9°; PI-LL mismatch = 16.8°. Only weak correlations (0.2-0.4) were identified between population sacral slope, SVA and SVA modifiers, and SRS function. SVA and SVA modifiers were weakly associated with ODI. Although there were more correlations in subset analysis of high-symptom patients, all were weak. Analysis of variance identified significant differences in ODI reported by SVA modifier groups.

Conclusion: In primary presentation patients with ASLS and a subset of "high-symptom" patients (ODI ≥ 40), only weak associations between baseline PROs and radiographic parameters were identified. For this patient population, these results suggest regional radiographic parameters (LC, LL, PT, PI-LL mismatch) are not drivers of PROs and cannot be used to extrapolate effect on patient-perceived pathology.

Level Of Evidence: 2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119760PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001613DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiographic parameters
20
primary presentation
16
patient-reported outcomes
8
adult symptomatic
8
symptomatic lumbar
8
lumbar scoliosis
8
patients
8
286 patients
8
patients study
8
spinal deformity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!