AI Article Synopsis

  • A study called XPORT aimed to assess the effects of continuing or stopping long-term omalizumab treatment in asthma patients, specifically looking at severe asthma exacerbations.* -
  • Results showed that 67% of patients continuing omalizumab experienced no severe exacerbations, compared to 47.7% in the placebo group, indicating a significant benefit from ongoing treatment.* -
  • Patients who continued on omalizumab also demonstrated better asthma control scores, while stopping the treatment led to an increase in IgE levels, although no safety issues were identified.*

Article Abstract

Background: Few data are available to assist clinicians with decisions regarding long-term use of asthma therapies, including omalizumab.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the benefit and persistence of response in subjects continuing or withdrawing from long-term omalizumab treatment.

Methods: Evaluating the Xolair Persistency Of Response After Long-Term Therapy (XPORT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study that included subjects with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma receiving long-term omalizumab. Subjects were randomized by using a hierarchical dynamic randomization scheme to continue their same dose of omalizumab or withdraw to placebo and were then followed every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was any protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcome was time to first protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. Exploratory outcomes included changes in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores.

Results: Significantly more subjects in the omalizumab group (67%) had no protocol-defined exacerbation than in the placebo group (47.7%); an absolute difference of 19.3% (95% CI, 5.0%, 33.6%) represents a 40.1% relative difference. Time to first protocol-defined exacerbation analysis revealed a significantly different between-group exacerbation pattern that was consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects continuing omalizumab had significantly better asthma control (mean [SD] change from baseline to week 52: Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 [4.14] vs placebo, -2.88 [5.38], P = .0188; Asthma Control Questionnaire score, 0.22 [0.66] vs placebo, 0.63 [1.13], P = .0039). Discontinuation of omalizumab was associated with an increase in free IgE levels and an increase in basophil expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor. No safety concerns were noted.

Conclusion: Continuation of omalizumab after long-term treatment results in continued benefit, as evidenced by improved symptom control and reduced exacerbation risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asthma control
20
asthma
9
evaluating xolair
8
persistence response
8
response long-term
8
long-term therapy
8
subjects continuing
8
long-term omalizumab
8
protocol-defined severe
8
severe asthma
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!