A Prospective Programmatic Cost Analysis of Fuel Your Life: A Worksite Translation of DPP.

J Occup Environ Med

Economic Evaluation Research Group, College of Public Health (Drs Ingels, Walcott, Corso); Workplace Health Group, College of Public Health (Mr Wilson, Ms Padilla, Drs Zuercher, DeJoy); and Department of Management, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia (Dr Vandenberg).

Published: November 2016

Objective: An accounting of the resources necessary for implementation of efficacious programs is important for economic evaluations and dissemination.

Methods: A programmatic costs analysis was conducted prospectively in conjunction with an efficacy trial of Fuel Your Life (FYL), a worksite translation of the Diabetes Prevention Program. FYL was implemented through three different modalities, Group, Phone, and Self-study, using a micro-costing approach from both the employer and societal perspectives.

Results: The Phone modality was the most costly at $354.6 per participant, compared with $154.6 and $75.5 for the Group and Self-study modalities, respectively. With the inclusion of participant-related costs, the Phone modality was still more expensive than the Group modality but with a smaller incremental difference ($461.4 vs $368.1).

Conclusions: This level of cost-related detail for a preventive intervention is rare, and our analysis can aid in the transparency of future economic evaluations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5927588PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000868DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fuel life
8
worksite translation
8
economic evaluations
8
phone modality
8
prospective programmatic
4
programmatic cost
4
cost analysis
4
analysis fuel
4
life worksite
4
translation dpp
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!