A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Functional and radiological evaluation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation treated with anchors without eyelet: comparison with other techniques. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study evaluated the effectiveness of different surgical techniques for treating acromioclavicular joint dislocations (grades III and V), focusing on using anchors without eyelet and comparing them with alternatives like tightrope and cerclage.
  • Researchers analyzed 36 patients’ outcomes using various metrics (including DASH, UCLA, VAS, and SF-36) and noted that the average scores indicated good results across all techniques, with no significant difference in effectiveness.
  • The findings revealed that while using anchors without eyelet had a shorter average surgical time, the final radiological results were notably influenced by the initial spacing in the acromioclavicular joint and measurements taken post-surgery.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the repair results of acromioclavicular dislocations (ACJD) grades III and V, with anchors without eyelet, when compared with other techniques, and to evaluate factors that can affect the final result.

Methods: A retrospective study of 36 patients with ACJD grades III and V in the Rockwood classification, 12 treated with anchors without eyelet, 11 with one tightrope, six with two tightropes, and six with subcoracoid cerclage, operated from September 2012 to February 2015. Patients were assessed radiographically and through DASH, UCLA, the visual analog scale of pain (VAS) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Surgical time and the possible influence of some factors in the outcome were also assessed.

Results: The mean DASH score was 6.7; UCLA, 32.9; VAS, 1.2; and SF-36, 79.47. Radiographically, the final mean measurement was 9.93 mm, with no statistical difference between the groups. The mean surgical time for Group I was 31 min; Group II, 19 min; Group III, 29 min; and Group IV, 59 min. There was a significant difference between Groups II and IV when compared with the study group. The initial and immediate post-operative ACJD measurements ACJD were correlated with the final measure.

Conclusion: The repair of acute ACJD with anchors without eyelet is as effective as the other methods, with significantly shorter operative time when compared with the subcoracoid cerclage technique. The final radiological result is influenced by the coracoclavicular initial distance and the immediate postoperative measurement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5091025PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anchors eyelet
16
treated anchors
8
acjd grades
8
grades iii
8
subcoracoid cerclage
8
surgical time
8
difference groups
8
acjd
5
group
5
functional radiological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!