Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction provides oncological safety, requires longer operation time. It does not influence the initiation of adjuvant therapy and radiological control, and results in favourable cosmetic outcome.
Aim: Assessing the Hungarian data of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstructions, and comparing them to international findings.
Method: Between May, 2011 and September, 2014 121 therapeutic and prophylactic, postmastectomy immediate breast reconstructions were performed in 100 patients. The clinico-pathological findings were assessed retrospectively, and surgical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated statistically.
Results: The mean age of patients was 42.6 years, the follow up time was 29.4 months, and the duration of operation was 132 minutes. Skin-sparing mastectomy was performed most commonly (64%) with submuscular tissue expander placement (70%). Early postoperative complication was identified in 18 patients, and loco-regional recurrence in 1 patient. Most patients (89%) were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. The average initiation time of adjuvant therapy was 4.8 weeks.
Conclusions: Immediate breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option in line with international findings. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(46), 1830-1838.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/650.2016.30569 | DOI Listing |
Plast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Patient expectations have been shown to influence postoperative outcomes across surgical specialties. However, the impact of expectations in breast reconstruction is not well understood. The purpose of this project is to perform the first large-scale analysis and classification of BREAST-Q Expectations responses in patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
February 2025
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Understand the unique differences between mastopexy in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. (2) Describe the approach to performing mastopexy with autoaugmentation or after explantation. (3) Have insight into the approach and decision-making process for performing mastopexy with nipple-sparing mastectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiother Oncol
January 2025
School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Radiation Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address:
Unlabelled: Our previous study on breast cancer BRCA carriers disclosed a high local recurrence (LR) rate in patients who underwent skin sparing (SSM) or nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) without postoperative radiation therapy (RT), compared to breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with RT. The current study compares the LR rates in BRCA versus non BRCA carriers after SSM/NSM in relation the receipt of RT.
Methods: The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
JPRAS Open
March 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
Breast revision surgery is often necessary in patients following postmastectomy breast reconstruction with free autologous flaps for aesthetic improvement. Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy continue to be expanded oncologically. However, revision techniques for aesthetic concerns following breast reconstruction are underreported in the literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiat Oncol
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050035, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!