Objectives The objective was to determine survival and changes in creatinine concentrations after administration of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4) vs crystalloids in critically ill cats. Methods The medical records were reviewed for cats admitted to the intensive care unit with at least two plasma creatinine measurements and initial concentrations not exceeding the upper reference interval. Cats were excluded if they had received HES prior to admission or if they had received fluid therapy for <24 h between initial and subsequent measurements. Changes in creatinine concentrations were evaluated as the percentage change from initial values to the maximum subsequent measurements. Cats receiving only crystalloids were assigned to the crystalloid group; cats receiving only HES or HES and crystalloids were assigned to the HES group. Results Ninety-three cats were included in the study (62 in the crystalloid group, 31 in the HES group). The total median cumulative HES dose was 94 ml/kg (range 26-422 ml/kg) and 24 ml/kg/day (range 16-42 ml/kg/day). No difference was detected between the groups for age, sex, body weight or mortality. The HES group had a significantly longer length of hospitalisation ( P = 0.012), lower albumin concentrations ( P <0.001), higher Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation scores ( P = 0.037) and higher incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( P = 0.009) and sepsis ( P = 0.013). There was no significant difference in initial, maximum or maximum change in creatinine concentrations between the groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in maximum change in creatinine concentrations in the subgroups of cats with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Conclusions and relevance In this population of cats, the administration of HES did not result in a significantly greater increase in creatinine from values measured on admission or higher mortality compared with administration of crystalloids. Further prospective studies are needed to assess both safety and efficacy of HES in cats before recommendations can be made.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110996 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X16676160 | DOI Listing |
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)
August 2024
Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Clin Med
August 2023
Doctoral School of Pathological Sciences, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary.
To reassess the results of former meta-analyses focusing on the relationship between novel HES preparations (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) and acute kidney injury.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Anesth
February 2023
Department of Environmental Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wakou, Saitama, 351-0197, Japan.
Front Vet Sci
January 2022
Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Intravenous hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are potentially nephrotoxic due to rapid renal tissue uptake, subsequent osmotic nephrosis, and long-lasting intracellular storage. This study aimed to investigate the severity of intracellular storage of HES in renal tissue samples from critically ill dogs receiving 6% HES 130/0.4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Anaesth
January 2022
Missouri Prevention Science Institute and Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!