Objectives: To investigate the performance of the meropenem and imipenem double-ended Etest ± EDTA and the tablet-based (meropenem and meropenem + dipicolinic acid) KPC/MBL Confirm Kit to detect cfiA metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) in Bacteroides fragilis.

Methods: Well-characterized B. fragilis isolates, most from previously published studies, harbouring the cfiA gene and covering a wide range of meropenem MICs were included (n = 21).

Results: The imipenem double-ended Etest showed an indeterminate result in 95% of the included isolates with the cfiA gene (20 of 21), whereas the meropenem double-ended Etest gave an MIC ratio ≥8 (positive test) with all the isolates. All isolates that were meropenem intermediate or resistant had a zone diameter difference ≥6 mm with the KPC/MBL Confirm Kit.

Conclusions: The meropenem double-ended Etest and not imipenem should be preferred for phenotypic detection of MBLs in B. fragilis. The KPC/MBL Confirm Kit could be an alternative with isolates that are meropenem intermediate or resistant (MIC >2 mg/L).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw436DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

double-ended etest
16
kpc/mbl confirm
16
confirm kit
12
phenotypic detection
8
cfia metallo-β-lactamase
8
imipenem double-ended
8
cfia gene
8
meropenem double-ended
8
isolates meropenem
8
meropenem intermediate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!