Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
First-generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS), represented by the three marked-approved devices (Absorb BVS 1.1, DESolve NX, and DREAMS) have demonstrated, in low to moderate angiographic scenarios, similar efficacy to current generation metallic drug-eluting stents. However, a trend toward more device thrombosis have been observed, especially when the scaffolds are used in off-label situations. Among the main shortcomings of this novel technology, we highlight: (1) Increased strut thickness (≥150 μm) and crossing profile; (2) low resistance to overexpansion; (3) lack of radiopacity, and; (4) special storage requirements. In order to overcome these limitations and improve their acute performance and midterm safety, a dozen of novel BRS are currently under research, in different stages of development. In the present review, we address three of these new technologies, pointing out their innovative features and initial clinical results. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26813 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!