A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differentiating recurrent tumours from post-treatment changes in head and neck cancers: does diffusion-weighted MRI solve the eternal dilemma? | LitMetric

Aim: To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating post-treatment changes from tumour recurrence in head and neck cancers and to establish a threshold apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to differentiate the two conditions.

Materials And Methods: This was a prospective study of 80 treated head and neck cancer patients. The patient cohort consisted of a wide spectrum of head and neck sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, and infra-temporal fossa. Qualitative analysis of the diffusion images and quantitative analysis of the corresponding ADC maps was performed and the data were correlated with histopathological findings and clinical examinations.

Results: The mean ADC value of recurrent tumours in the present cohort was 0. 932±0.19×10 mm/s and the mean ADC value of lesions representing post-treatment changes was 1.394±0.32×10 mm/s. A threshold ADC value of 1.2×10mm/s used to differentiate post-treatment changes from recurrent head and neck cancers showed the highest combined sensitivity of 90.13%, specificity of 82.5%, accuracy of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, and mean kappa measurement of agreement of 72.8.

Conclusion: Combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of DWI is a useful non-invasive technique to differentiate recurrent head and neck malignancies from post-treatment changes using a threshold ADC value.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head neck
24
post-treatment changes
20
neck cancers
12
recurrent tumours
8
quantitative analysis
8
threshold adc
8
recurrent head
8
head
6
neck
6
adc
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!