Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating post-treatment changes from tumour recurrence in head and neck cancers and to establish a threshold apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to differentiate the two conditions.
Materials And Methods: This was a prospective study of 80 treated head and neck cancer patients. The patient cohort consisted of a wide spectrum of head and neck sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, and infra-temporal fossa. Qualitative analysis of the diffusion images and quantitative analysis of the corresponding ADC maps was performed and the data were correlated with histopathological findings and clinical examinations.
Results: The mean ADC value of recurrent tumours in the present cohort was 0. 932±0.19×10 mm/s and the mean ADC value of lesions representing post-treatment changes was 1.394±0.32×10 mm/s. A threshold ADC value of 1.2×10mm/s used to differentiate post-treatment changes from recurrent head and neck cancers showed the highest combined sensitivity of 90.13%, specificity of 82.5%, accuracy of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, and mean kappa measurement of agreement of 72.8.
Conclusion: Combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of DWI is a useful non-invasive technique to differentiate recurrent head and neck malignancies from post-treatment changes using a threshold ADC value.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.019 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!