A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged Between 5 and 14.

Clin J Sport Med

*Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;†Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;‡College of Pharmacy, Roseman University, South Jordan, Utah;Departments of §Electrical & Computer Engineering; and¶Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Published: November 2016

Objective: Pediatric head injuries occur commonly and are being reported in increasing numbers. Balance testing is a key component in the evaluation of suspected concussion, and the balance error scoring system (BESS) is likely the most well-known and widely used measure. To date, normative BESS scores for adults have been reported but not for children.

Design: Normative data for BESS scores and modified BESS scores were created in a cohort of healthy children. Potential variables were analyzed as predictors of BESS performance.

Setting: Local elementary and junior high schools.

Participants: A total of 373 healthy children between the ages of 5 and 14.

Interventions: The BESS was performed on all children.

Assessment Of Risk Factors: Gender, body mass index percentile, previous concussions, athletic participation, age, and the parental opinion of child's balance ability were examined as factors associated with the BESS score.

Main Outcome Measures: BESS scores.

Results: Normative data are reported, stratified by age groups of 5 to 7 years, 8 to 10 years, and 11 to 14 years of age, for both BESS and modified BESS. Median BESS scores are 23 for children aged 5 to 7, 18 for children aged 8 to 10, and 16 for children aged 11 to 14. Median modified BESS scores are 8 for children age 5 to 7, 5 for children age 8 to 10, and 4 for children age 11 to 14. Increasing age and positive parental opinion regarding their child's balance ability were independently correlated with decreasing BESS scores (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The normative data on BESS scores for healthy children reported here provide age-stratified reference values for suspected balance alterations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000285DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bess scores
28
children aged
16
bess
14
normative data
12
modified bess
12
healthy children
12
children age
12
children
10
balance error
8
error scoring
8

Similar Publications

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected data.

Objective: This study aims to define clinically relevant blood loss in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

Background: Current definitions of excessive blood loss following spine surgery are highly variable and may be suboptimal in predicting adverse events (AE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how different reasons for revision surgery in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients affect their postoperative outcomes, revealing a high incidence of reoperations.
  • A sample of 891 ASD patients was analyzed retrospectively, categorizing their revisions by cause, and assessing complications, radiographic results, and disability metrics.
  • Findings suggest that different etiologies (mechanical, infection, wound, and SI pain) lead to varying outcomes, with mechanical issues showing less improvement over time compared to others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine age group differences in the postural stability of female rhythmic gymnasts, as well as the asymmetries in postural control between them.

Methods: A total of 126 female rhythmic gymnasts (aged 6-12 years) were tested. The rhythmic gymnasts were grouped based on their age between 6-8 years (N.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify baseline patient and surgical factors predictive of optimal outcomes in staged versus same-day combined-approach surgery.

Methods: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with baseline and perioperative (by 6 weeks) data were stratified based on single-stage (same-day) or multistage (staged) surgery, excluding planned multiple hospitalizations. Means comparison analyses were used to assess baseline demographic, radiographic, and surgical differences between cohorts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the impact of the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score components on patient outcomes in Adult Spine Deformity (ASD) surgery.

Methods: Patients included underwent assessment via the GAP score and its individual components: pelvic version (GAP PV), lumbar lordosis (GAP LL), lumbar distribution index (GAP LDI) and spinopelvic component (GAP SP). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between alignment in these components and clinical outcomes in ASD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!